What can Republicans do to be competitive in the Pacific Northwest again?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 19, 2024, 04:45:58 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Presidential Election Trends (Moderator: 100% pro-life no matter what)
  What can Republicans do to be competitive in the Pacific Northwest again?
« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 3 [4]
Author Topic: What can Republicans do to be competitive in the Pacific Northwest again?  (Read 12582 times)
Sumner 1868
tara gilesbie
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,058
United States
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #75 on: April 03, 2015, 05:03:56 PM »

Well, since this thread is dangerously close to going off the rails, I conclude by restating they can do nothing and nothing shall succeed for the foreseeable decades.
Logged
smoltchanov
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,380
Russian Federation


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #76 on: April 04, 2015, 12:44:15 AM »

Well, since this thread is dangerously close to going off the rails, I conclude by restating they can do nothing and nothing shall succeed for the foreseeable decades.

I disagree. Yes, Democrats will win a solid majority of statwide and congressional races in Pacific Northwest in foreseable future. But - far from all. Republicans were close in number of statewide races in Washington, Oregon and California recently, and even won some of them (like Washington SoS). They surely will do it in the future too. From time to time..
Logged
bobloblaw
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,018
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #77 on: April 04, 2015, 01:39:40 PM »

Someday, the Republicans might actually run a moderate for a major statewide race. They'd probably also need a favorable climate as well. Even then, it would be pretty close.

What you guys dont get is this. A moderate loses more conservative votes than they pick up in moderate votes. In a state with NO conservatives like NJ that can happen. But WA has lots of conservatives in Eastern WA who sit home on election day if there is no conservative on the ballot.


Washington has mail-in ballots.

So theyd toss their ballots
Logged
smoltchanov
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,380
Russian Federation


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #78 on: April 05, 2015, 12:31:08 AM »

Someday, the Republicans might actually run a moderate for a major statewide race. They'd probably also need a favorable climate as well. Even then, it would be pretty close.

What you guys dont get is this. A moderate loses more conservative votes than they pick up in moderate votes. In a state with NO conservatives like NJ that can happen. But WA has lots of conservatives in Eastern WA who sit home on election day if there is no conservative on the ballot.


Washington has mail-in ballots.

So theyd toss their ballots

Do it, please. In EVERY election.
Logged
Replicator
Rookie
**
Posts: 89
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #79 on: April 05, 2015, 02:11:52 AM »

Mathematically, those states aren't as far left as Democrats think. Looking at numbers OR was roughly 8 points left of center in 2012 while WA was a few more to the left. That makes them light blue states or perhaps in the case of OR purplish blue. Looking at the most recent GOP presidential wins, those states aren't too far apart. Too much emphasis is placed on recent results without any thought given to trends or distance from center.
Logged
Cobbler
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 914
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #80 on: April 06, 2015, 02:21:39 PM »

Someday, the Republicans might actually run a moderate for a major statewide race. They'd probably also need a favorable climate as well. Even then, it would be pretty close.

What you guys dont get is this. A moderate loses more conservative votes than they pick up in moderate votes. In a state with NO conservatives like NJ that can happen. But WA has lots of conservatives in Eastern WA who sit home on election day if there is no conservative on the ballot.


Washington has mail-in ballots.

So theyd toss their ballots

They didn't toss their ballots when McKenna ran for governor, and didn't lose because of lack of eastern Washington votes. But I'm glad you seem to be able to speak on behalf of all of them.

I'd argue that if Washington had its gubernatorial elections in midterm years like Massachusetts, someone like McKenna would've won.
Logged
smoltchanov
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,380
Russian Federation


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #81 on: April 06, 2015, 03:04:51 PM »

Someday, the Republicans might actually run a moderate for a major statewide race. They'd probably also need a favorable climate as well. Even then, it would be pretty close.

What you guys dont get is this. A moderate loses more conservative votes than they pick up in moderate votes. In a state with NO conservatives like NJ that can happen. But WA has lots of conservatives in Eastern WA who sit home on election day if there is no conservative on the ballot.


Washington has mail-in ballots.

So theyd toss their ballots

They didn't toss their ballots when McKenna ran for governor, and didn't lose because of lack of eastern Washington votes. But I'm glad you seem to be able to speak on behalf of all of them.

I'd argue that if Washington had its gubernatorial elections in midterm years like Massachusetts, someone like McKenna would've won.

McKenna was at least social moderate (if not liberal). Such person really could win in non-Presidential year. Social conservative - not even then...
Logged
justfollowingtheelections
unempprof
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,766


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #82 on: April 29, 2015, 07:36:14 PM »

Abandon their anti-environment rhetoric.  Get rid of clowns such as Inhofe.
Logged
KingSweden
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,227
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #83 on: April 29, 2015, 08:55:47 PM »

Abandon their anti-environment rhetoric.  Get rid of clowns such as Inhofe.

I doubt many NW people know who Inhofe is. Local Republicans tend to be pretty moderate on environmental issues
Logged
Skill and Chance
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,646
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #84 on: April 29, 2015, 09:18:08 PM »

Abandon their anti-environment rhetoric.  Get rid of clowns such as Inhofe.

But what would happen in Appalachia and the MS Valley if they did that?
Logged
Ebsy
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,001
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #85 on: April 29, 2015, 09:25:10 PM »

The price of nationalizing every political race is that you can't compete very well in more liberal states.
Logged
smoltchanov
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,380
Russian Federation


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #86 on: April 29, 2015, 10:50:38 PM »

The price of nationalizing every political race is that you can't compete very well in more liberal states.

The same for Democrats in conservative one's...
Logged
Ebsy
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,001
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #87 on: April 29, 2015, 11:38:25 PM »

The price of nationalizing every political race is that you can't compete very well in more liberal states.

The same for Democrats in conservative one's...
Indeed. But I'm not asking what Democrats can do to compete in Alabama.
Logged
Sumner 1868
tara gilesbie
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,058
United States
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #88 on: April 29, 2015, 11:58:48 PM »

Abandon their anti-environment rhetoric.  Get rid of clowns such as Inhofe.

It's not enough.
Logged
smoltchanov
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,380
Russian Federation


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #89 on: April 30, 2015, 02:55:05 AM »
« Edited: April 30, 2015, 03:05:27 AM by smoltchanov »

The price of nationalizing every political race is that you can't compete very well in more liberal states.

The same for Democrats in conservative one's...
Indeed. But I'm not asking what Democrats can do to compete in Alabama.

Sure. Though the answer here is not too difficult too: run more Richard Shelby-type candidates (at least - for state offices) and slowly restore positions lost in the last 20 years. In many aspects Shelby is exactly an "old style Alabama's Democrat".. And it's unlikely that Alabama will substantially change it's habits anytime soon
Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 [4]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.045 seconds with 11 queries.