Which will happen first?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 26, 2024, 09:37:56 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Debate (Moderator: Torie)
  Which will happen first?
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: ?
#1
Democrats win control of State Senate in NY and keep it.
 
#2
GOP wins the Governors offices in KY and WV
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 35

Author Topic: Which will happen first?  (Read 803 times)
CatoMinor
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,007
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: June 14, 2014, 12:11:32 AM »

?
Logged
The world will shine with light in our nightmare
Just Passion Through
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 45,282
Norway


Political Matrix
E: -6.32, S: -7.48

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: June 14, 2014, 12:59:04 AM »

Tough call, really.  Option 2.  I think the NY Senate is stuck where it is until redistricting and a new Democratic governor is in charge.  Otherwise, the only thing that could take it out of GOP hands would be a leadership coup, which of course is what brought the Senate in its current state.  I don't know what happens to the WV governorship after Tomblin (but I don't think the future is very bright for Democrats now), but Democrats have Conway in KY.  I don't think the Republicans stand much of a shot in that race.
Logged
Miles
MilesC56
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,325
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: June 14, 2014, 01:18:28 AM »

Leaning Option 2 because of the gerrymandering.
Logged
Sol
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,146
Bosnia and Herzegovina


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: June 14, 2014, 08:58:26 AM »

Isn't there some systematic malapportionment in the senate?
Logged
politicallefty
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,244
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -3.87, S: -9.22

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: June 14, 2014, 09:51:17 AM »

Isn't there some systematic malapportionment in the senate?

Yes, and it's quite nasty. The NY State Senate allows for a deviation of ±5%. I don't know how that can stand up based on Supreme Court precedent. The NY State Senate combines gerrymandering with malapportionment. Every downstate district is overpopulated and every upstate district is underpopulated.
Logged
DC Al Fine
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,085
Canada


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: June 14, 2014, 05:08:28 PM »

Isn't there some systematic malapportionment in the senate?

Yes, and it's quite nasty. The NY State Senate allows for a deviation of ±5%. I don't know how that can stand up based on Supreme Court precedent. The NY State Senate combines gerrymandering with malapportionment. Every downstate district is overpopulated and every upstate district is underpopulated.

Gee, lucky you. We're allowed ±20% here.
Logged
Indy Texas
independentTX
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,272
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.52, S: -3.48

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: June 14, 2014, 05:21:49 PM »

Tough call, really.  Option 2.  I think the NY Senate is stuck where it is until redistricting and a new Democratic governor is in charge.  Otherwise, the only thing that could take it out of GOP hands would be a leadership coup, which of course is what brought the Senate in its current state.  I don't know what happens to the WV governorship after Tomblin (but I don't think the future is very bright for Democrats now), but Democrats have Conway in KY.  I don't think the Republicans stand much of a shot in that race.

Could Manchin come back for a non-consecutive term? And are there any young (under 50) "up and coming" Democrats in WV?
Logged
CatoMinor
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,007
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: June 14, 2014, 06:16:11 PM »

Gee, lucky you. We're allowed ±20% here.

Wtf... does rural Nova Scotia run the political machine there lol?
Logged
Hatman 🍁
EarlAW
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 25,998
Canada


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: June 14, 2014, 07:41:41 PM »

Gee, lucky you. We're allowed ±20% here.

Wtf... does rural Nova Scotia run the political machine there lol?

No. We have fair non partisan boundary commissions in Canada. They have higher deviations to work with, but I don't believe rural Nova Scotia is over represented. However, that's not to say it doesn't happen. In Ontario, Northern Ontario is extremely over represented. Many districts exceed even 20% in deviation.
Logged
Sol
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,146
Bosnia and Herzegovina


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: June 14, 2014, 09:18:30 PM »

Gee, lucky you. We're allowed ±20% here.

Wtf... does rural Nova Scotia run the political machine there lol?

No. We have fair non partisan boundary commissions in Canada. They have higher deviations to work with, but I don't believe rural Nova Scotia is over represented. However, that's not to say it doesn't happen. In Ontario, Northern Ontario is extremely over represented. Many districts exceed even 20% in deviation.

That's evil. Deviation should be limited to at least below 1%. Why does Northern Ontario mooch so much?
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.029 seconds with 13 queries.