DEMOCRATS: Should the Democratic Party compete for Missouri in 2016?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
March 29, 2024, 02:09:43 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  DEMOCRATS: Should the Democratic Party compete for Missouri in 2016?
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]
Poll
Question: Should the 2016 Democratic presidential ticket make campaign stops and advertise advertisements in Missouri?
#1
Yes
 
#2
No
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 71

Author Topic: DEMOCRATS: Should the Democratic Party compete for Missouri in 2016?  (Read 2233 times)
anvi
anvikshiki
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,400
Netherlands


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #25 on: October 21, 2014, 08:22:16 PM »

Yeah, sure.  Any state where you were within 10 points last time around is worth putting in play, if for no other reason than to force the opponent to devote some resources to shoring up their turf. 
Logged
Devils30
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,967
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.06, S: -4.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #26 on: October 21, 2014, 10:49:17 PM »

Hillary will have plenty of money, trust me.
Logged
Senate Minority Leader Lord Voldemort
Joshua
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,710
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.52, S: -5.91

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #27 on: October 22, 2014, 12:10:03 AM »

Hillary will have plenty of money, trust me.

Seriously.

If there's anyone that would have more money than Obama, it'd be Hillary.
Logged
Mr. Illini
liberty142
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,838
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.26, S: -3.30

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #28 on: October 22, 2014, 12:49:06 AM »

Only if North Carolina looks to be heading our way. Otherwise focus efforts on taking that and solidifying Virginia and Colorado.
Logged
BaconBacon96
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,678
Ireland, Republic of


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #29 on: October 22, 2014, 01:34:33 AM »

The Democrats don't need Missouri, so no.

Obama didn't need Florida, Ohio, or Virginia either. So he should have conceded them to Romney?

Obama had too much money to burn. I don't think Hillary will have comparable amounts of money.

Competing in states that are unnecessary is a luxury Hillary just might not be able to afford.

Hillary will have plenty of access to the money machine that Obama has built. She'll be able to spend money on Missouri.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.023 seconds with 14 queries.