Obviously, she was obligated to defend the guy, and no one can fault her for that. It is nonetheless disheartening to read that she basically tried to use the "little bit nutty, little bit slutty’’ rape defense in a case where the victim was a 12 year old. (E.g., she wrote "I have been informed that the complainant is emotionally unstable...with a tendency to seek out older men and to engage in fastasizing.”) I hope she now wishes that she hadn't decided to go that route, but whatevs. It was a long time ago.
At the risk of sounding MRA here, I don't see why that isn't something that should be considered if actually true, especially if the girl had made false accusations in the past. In fact, I don't even consider that the disturbing part of the tape in the same way her laughing about the ordeal was.
