Kelo V. City of New London

[True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)]

Obviously, there should be some means of handling wayward parcels.  I'm not certain that eminent domain should be the technique, but yes there should be, and whatever is the method to be generally used should be followed.  Technically, the parcel in your example is not what is wayward but the beneficee(s) of the trust, so whatever means is used to resolve a wayward trust should apply.

[Oldiesfreak1854]

Dissent. Of course, I'm not expert in the law, especially not American constitutional law, but, from my point of view, 'economic development' is a very spurious justification for the seizure of private land via eminent domain. State security matters are, from my perspective, the only major reason for the use of eminent domain.

This.