@Butafiend: sick life bro
You can somehow justify allowing little children to watch pornography, decriminalizing public urination, legalizing hempfests
Spare me the pearl-clutching.
I've posted my reasonings in various threads.
I haven't named anything after you.
Happy is problematic because it isn't lyrically obscene when it's only examined piecemeal. However, when you analyze the lyrics (and musical content) on the whole it becomes more apparent why Happy is obscene: in its repetition and lack of creativity. Happy is audible diarrhea and is not fit for Northeastern radio stations. The first part of this quote raises a more interesting question though: Are there certain songs that do rise to the level of being banned? RIP Cannibal Corpse.
I don't know if the onus is necessarily upon me, but I will be glad to defend this case in court. I am a patriot, and will fight this good fight for the sake of my countrymen.
That said, I'm alarmed that people don't think banning Happy is legal. Whatever happened to government as a force for good? 
Banning "Happy" was the right decision to make. I stand by Governor Dallasfan65, and call for Pharrell to be detained indefinitely at Guantanamo Bay prison for crimes against humanity. (i.e. the production of that song)
#KeeptheNortheastStrong
