2012 as a 60% landslide (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 30, 2024, 08:27:26 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  2012 as a 60% landslide (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: 2012 as a 60% landslide  (Read 6616 times)
Mehmentum
Icefire9
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,600
United States


« on: October 31, 2014, 04:40:51 PM »
« edited: October 31, 2014, 04:48:46 PM by Mehmentum »

The highest any candidate has gotten in the 7 elections since Reagan's re-election is 53.4%.

A 60% landslide would suggest something fundamentally changing in our political environment.  In practice things like 538's elasticity score only hold up under a certain range of conditions, and would probably fail in this situation.

The elasticity score is determined by the number of 'swing' voters in the state, but in a 60% landslide suggests that not only is one candidate winning most swing voters, but a large number of people who usually vote for the other party.

Look at what's happened to Brownback and Roberts in Kansas.  A 60% landslide would be the equivalent of what happened in Kansas this year, all over the country.  That would mean that the losing candidate is fighting for his life solidly Democratic/Republican states and only safe in a few strongholds.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.016 seconds with 12 queries.