Does
a GMC Canyon pickup or a Jeep or a "twenty year old camper van" make a man who has more money than you ever will more relatable?
Is all of this really necessary?
It seems like to intentionally purchase a modest car before beginning a political campaign is a tacit legitimization by these candidates of any criticism of their wealth or assertions that it makes them unrelatable or out of touch.
But of all the offensive things Mitt Romney said and did during his 2012 campaign, I don't think many in the 47 Percent were bothered by the fact that he was a Cadillac owner.
If "Buying American" is a requirement, is a Honda or a Toyota that was built in the United States an acceptable choice? Should candidates buy cars made by GM, given their shoddy safety record and wanton disregard for their customers' safety in recent years and their dependence on government bailouts to keep them afloat?
Do most people even know what kind of cars their elected officials or their opponents drive, apart from the attention whores mentioned in the Bloomberg article?