should brtd be banned?

[Chancellor Tanterterg]

Should he be banned?  Eeh, I guess not.

Should he crawl under a rock of his own accord out of pure shame for everything he is and has done to us, and never darken our hallowed forum again?  Absolutely!

[MasterJedi]

Yes, along with Lief and Snowstalker.

[The world will shine with light in our nightmare]

Yes, along with Lief and Snowstalker.

Yet another mod who bases his judgments on his personal relationships with users rather than how their behavior impacts the forum.

Seriously, what have any of these guys done that warrants their removal from the board?

[Joe Republic]

Yes, along with Lief and Snowstalker.

Yet another mod who bases his judgments on his personal relationships with users rather than how their behavior impacts the forum.

Don't worry; it's fair to describe MJ as a 'moderator' rather than a moderator.

[MasterJedi]

Yes, along with Lief and Snowstalker.

Yet another mod who bases his judgments on his personal relationships with users rather than how their behavior impacts the forum.

Don't worry; it's fair to describe MJ as a 'moderator' rather than a moderator.

Well I've gotten a good job with a great company, have good friends that I spend a lot of time with, just started a relationship and generally don't spend much time on the internet anymore. What's your excuse as to why you're still here all the time?

[Paul Kemp]

Yes, along with Lief and Snowstalker.

Yet another mod who bases his judgments on his personal relationships with users rather than how their behavior impacts the forum.

Don't worry; it's fair to describe MJ as a 'moderator' rather than a moderator.

Well I've gotten a good job with a great company, have good friends that I spend a lot of time with, just started a relationship and generally don't spend much time on the internet anymore. What's your excuse as to why you're still here all the time?

[Antonio the Sixth]

Is that the 11th Doctor? Sure looks like him.

[traininthedistance]

Yes, along with Lief and Snowstalker.

Yet another mod who bases his judgments on his personal relationships with users rather than how their behavior impacts the forum.

Don't worry; it's fair to describe MJ as a 'moderator' rather than a moderator.

Well I've gotten a good job with a great company, have good friends that I spend a lot of time with, just started a relationship and generally don't spend much time on the internet anymore. What's your excuse as to why you're still here all the time?

Good job ducking Scott's question.

[The world will shine with light in our nightmare]

Yes, along with Lief and Snowstalker.

Yet another mod who bases his judgments on his personal relationships with users rather than how their behavior impacts the forum.

Don't worry; it's fair to describe MJ as a 'moderator' rather than a moderator.

Well I've gotten a good job with a great company, have good friends that I spend a lot of time with, just started a relationship and generally don't spend much time on the internet anymore. What's your excuse as to why you're still here all the time?

Why don't you step down, at least?  All you do here is put down other users.  Don't get me wrong, I take issue with a lot of posters here - both former and current - but at least there are people of just about every ideology whom I can call a friend.

And yeah, good job not answering the question.  Quite an impartial moderator, you are.

[MasterJedi]

Yes, along with Lief and Snowstalker.

Yet another mod who bases his judgments on his personal relationships with users rather than how their behavior impacts the forum.

Don't worry; it's fair to describe MJ as a 'moderator' rather than a moderator.

Well I've gotten a good job with a great company, have good friends that I spend a lot of time with, just started a relationship and generally don't spend much time on the internet anymore. What's your excuse as to why you're still here all the time?

Why don't you step down, at least?  All you do here is put down other users.  Don't get me wrong, I take issue with a lot of posters here - both former and current - but at least there are people of just about every ideology whom I can call a friend.

And yeah, good job not answering the question.  Quite an impartial moderator, you are.

This really is the most lax forum that you will probably ever find. It takes forever to get banned for the most part. I'm used to other forms (I don't moderate anywhere else) where the three I mentioned, plus actually many others who I don't think should be banned, would have been thrown out LONG ago, and NONE of those forums have the kind of crazy crap that goes on here. Be kind to your benevolent God Dave Leip because when the gentle giant awakens it usually doesn't go how the forum likes it.

[Napoleon]

0 for 2, whew.

[The world will shine with light in our nightmare]

Yes, along with Lief and Snowstalker.

Yet another mod who bases his judgments on his personal relationships with users rather than how their behavior impacts the forum.

Don't worry; it's fair to describe MJ as a 'moderator' rather than a moderator.

Well I've gotten a good job with a great company, have good friends that I spend a lot of time with, just started a relationship and generally don't spend much time on the internet anymore. What's your excuse as to why you're still here all the time?

Why don't you step down, at least?  All you do here is put down other users.  Don't get me wrong, I take issue with a lot of posters here - both former and current - but at least there are people of just about every ideology whom I can call a friend.

And yeah, good job not answering the question.  Quite an impartial moderator, you are.

This really is the most lax forum that you will probably ever find. It takes forever to get banned for the most part. I'm used to other forms (I don't moderate anywhere else) where the three I mentioned, plus actually many others who I don't think should be banned, would have been thrown out LONG ago, and NONE of those forums have the kind of crazy crap that goes on here. Be kind to your benevolent God Dave Leip because when the gentle giant awakens it usually doesn't go how the forum likes it.

And nowhere in that wall of text did you answer my question.

I give up.

[Snowstalker Mk. II]

Yes, along with Lief and Snowstalker.

lolol

[MaxQue]

It seems than the Wisconsin bully is back.

[Joe Republic]

It seems than the Wisconsin bully is back.

Being a bully requires an ability to swing a punch, let alone land one.

[Maxwell]

There isn't really a case to ban him, unfortunately.

[Oldiesfreak1854]

There isn't really a case to ban him, unfortunately.

[Torie]

There is a zero chance that BRTD will be banned. Why do you guys waste your time on such frolics and detours (turns out this little legal verbal juxtaposition comes out of the law of agency, which I didn't know until today while listening to the apposite lecture online - principal not liable for his agent's frolics, but is for torts committed while on mere detours)?

[Incipimus iterum]

There isn't really a case to ban him, unfortunately.