In what states could a drop in black support for D candidate cause flip to R's?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 24, 2024, 03:47:15 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  In what states could a drop in black support for D candidate cause flip to R's?
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: In what states could a drop in black support for D candidate cause flip to R's?  (Read 666 times)
Non Swing Voter
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,181


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: July 02, 2014, 05:37:49 PM »

The only states I can think of that Obama won in 2012 are Florida, Pennsylvania and Virginia.  But ultimately I don't think it will flip either Pennsylvania or Virginia... might flip Florida.  Michigan seems like too much of a stretch unless there is a huge drop in support.
Logged
henster
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,986


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: July 02, 2014, 06:01:35 PM »

Ohio, Virginia, Florida. Democrats do well enough with white voters in Pennsylvania to win the state even with reduced black turnout. But in Ohio blacks made up 15% of voters even though their only 12% of the population meaning they turned at a very high rate for Obama. If the black vote drops back down to 11-13% in Ohio it could be fatal for Dems they would have to do better among white voters.
Logged
Non Swing Voter
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,181


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: July 02, 2014, 09:17:09 PM »

Ohio, Virginia, Florida. Democrats do well enough with white voters in Pennsylvania to win the state even with reduced black turnout. But in Ohio blacks made up 15% of voters even though their only 12% of the population meaning they turned at a very high rate for Obama. If the black vote drops back down to 11-13% in Ohio it could be fatal for Dems they would have to do better among white voters.

Good call, I forgot about Ohio.
Logged
Never
Never Convinced
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,623
Political Matrix
E: 4.65, S: 3.30

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: July 02, 2014, 09:32:46 PM »

Virginia probably has the highest African-American vote (20%) of any Obama 2012 swing state, so I suppose the state is an acceptable place to start. In 2012, President Obama won 93% of the AfrAm vote, which was actually more than his 92% showing in 2008.

Using the New York Times' nifty interactive presidential demographics tool (turning off immigration reform for the time being), I noticed that if we left every other group the same, it would take a drop in the national African-American vote from 95% Democratic to 83% in order for Virginia to flip Republican (since the African-American vote was two points more Republican than the nation, that would mean the AfrAm vote in the state would be a historically low 81% in this scenario. The state tied for second to flip with Ohio, while Florida was the first to flip at a national 88% of the African-American vote.

So, leaving everything else constant for the sake of this exercise, Florida would probably be the first (and only?) state to flip Republican if the Democrat only weakened with the African-American vote and maintained Obama's performance with all other demographic groups, while Virginia and Ohio would necessitate a historically low level of African-American support in order to deliver those states to the Republican column. OP, you mentioned Pennsylvania and Michigan in your inquiry. I had to drop the national African-American vote to 72% to flip the state, and 63-64% to flip Michigan (the next state to flip was Nevada, when African-American support for the Democrat dropped to an absurdly low 51%).  In Pennsylvania, African-Americans made up only 13% of the electorate in 2012, a small sum compared to Virginia. Furthermore, White voters in PA weren't as Republican as Whites in Virginia. That might shed some insight. In other words, you are right that Pennsylvania wouldn't flip due to a drop in the African-American vote for the Democratic candidate alone, and it is probably far-fetched to say that Ohio or Virginia could flip due to a decline in African-American support of a Democratic nominee, considering this drop would have to be to the lowest point since 1992 or 1960 (and even that 83% from 1992 has to be viewed with the consideration that there was an abnormally strong third-party candidate on the ballot). In short, Florida seems like the only state that could realistically flip due to a drop in African-American support for the Democrat.
Logged
henster
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,986


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: July 02, 2014, 10:24:34 PM »

Virginia probably has the highest African-American vote (20%) of any Obama 2012 swing state, so I suppose the state is an acceptable place to start. In 2012, President Obama won 93% of the AfrAm vote, which was actually more than his 92% showing in 2008.

Using the New York Times' nifty interactive presidential demographics tool (turning off immigration reform for the time being), I noticed that if we left every other group the same, it would take a drop in the national African-American vote from 95% Democratic to 83% in order for Virginia to flip Republican (since the African-American vote was two points more Republican than the nation, that would mean the AfrAm vote in the state would be a historically low 81% in this scenario. The state tied for second to flip with Ohio, while Florida was the first to flip at a national 88% of the African-American vote.

So, leaving everything else constant for the sake of this exercise, Florida would probably be the first (and only?) state to flip Republican if the Democrat only weakened with the African-American vote and maintained Obama's performance with all other demographic groups, while Virginia and Ohio would necessitate a historically low level of African-American support in order to deliver those states to the Republican column. OP, you mentioned Pennsylvania and Michigan in your inquiry. I had to drop the national African-American vote to 72% to flip the state, and 63-64% to flip Michigan (the next state to flip was Nevada, when African-American support for the Democrat dropped to an absurdly low 51%).  In Pennsylvania, African-Americans made up only 13% of the electorate in 2012, a small sum compared to Virginia. Furthermore, White voters in PA weren't as Republican as Whites in Virginia. That might shed some insight. In other words, you are right that Pennsylvania wouldn't flip due to a drop in the African-American vote for the Democratic candidate alone, and it is probably far-fetched to say that Ohio or Virginia could flip due to a decline in African-American support of a Democratic nominee, considering this drop would have to be to the lowest point since 1992 or 1960 (and even that 83% from 1992 has to be viewed with the consideration that there was an abnormally strong third-party candidate on the ballot). In short, Florida seems like the only state that could realistically flip due to a drop in African-American support for the Democrat.

A dropout in turnout is far more fatal to Dems than a drop in support among blacks. Dems would probably do fine with winning in the 80s among blacks but if turnout is lower their influence is less. If blacks drop to around 16 or 18% in Virginia it could really hurt Hillary even if she's winning 90+ of blacks.
Logged
Never
Never Convinced
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,623
Political Matrix
E: 4.65, S: 3.30

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: July 02, 2014, 10:33:27 PM »

Virginia probably has the highest African-American vote (20%) of any Obama 2012 swing state, so I suppose the state is an acceptable place to start. In 2012, President Obama won 93% of the AfrAm vote, which was actually more than his 92% showing in 2008.

Using the New York Times' nifty interactive presidential demographics tool (turning off immigration reform for the time being), I noticed that if we left every other group the same, it would take a drop in the national African-American vote from 95% Democratic to 83% in order for Virginia to flip Republican (since the African-American vote was two points more Republican than the nation, that would mean the AfrAm vote in the state would be a historically low 81% in this scenario. The state tied for second to flip with Ohio, while Florida was the first to flip at a national 88% of the African-American vote.

So, leaving everything else constant for the sake of this exercise, Florida would probably be the first (and only?) state to flip Republican if the Democrat only weakened with the African-American vote and maintained Obama's performance with all other demographic groups, while Virginia and Ohio would necessitate a historically low level of African-American support in order to deliver those states to the Republican column. OP, you mentioned Pennsylvania and Michigan in your inquiry. I had to drop the national African-American vote to 72% to flip the state, and 63-64% to flip Michigan (the next state to flip was Nevada, when African-American support for the Democrat dropped to an absurdly low 51%).  In Pennsylvania, African-Americans made up only 13% of the electorate in 2012, a small sum compared to Virginia. Furthermore, White voters in PA weren't as Republican as Whites in Virginia. That might shed some insight. In other words, you are right that Pennsylvania wouldn't flip due to a drop in the African-American vote for the Democratic candidate alone, and it is probably far-fetched to say that Ohio or Virginia could flip due to a decline in African-American support of a Democratic nominee, considering this drop would have to be to the lowest point since 1992 or 1960 (and even that 83% from 1992 has to be viewed with the consideration that there was an abnormally strong third-party candidate on the ballot). In short, Florida seems like the only state that could realistically flip due to a drop in African-American support for the Democrat.

A dropout in turnout is far more fatal to Dems than a drop in support among blacks. Dems would probably do fine with winning in the 80s among blacks but if turnout is lower their influence is less. If blacks drop to around 16 or 18% in Virginia it could really hurt Hillary even if she's winning 90+ of blacks.

I definitely agree. If African-American turnout declined to 18% here in Virginia, Hillary Clinton would probably lose the state by a point or two. Unfortunately for Republicans, it appears that high African-American turnout predated the Obama era in this state, considering that they made up 21% of the electorate in 2004. The exit poll information from CNN showed Kerry winning only 87% of the African-American vote here that year. The best solution for the GOP here would be to campaign in a manner that would increase our numbers with all demographic groups instead of counting on a decline in African-American turnout that probably will not materialize.
Logged
BaconBacon96
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,678
Ireland, Republic of


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: July 02, 2014, 10:36:13 PM »

Black turnout will not drop enough to lose any state. People on this site seem to forget that blacks  heavily voted Democrat before Obama.
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: July 02, 2014, 11:45:17 PM »

Black turnout will not drop enough to lose any state. People on this site seem to forget that blacks  heavily voted Democrat before Obama.

This. However, it could have an effect in states that are extremely tight.

By the way, you combo broke the string of Virginia avatars. Wink
Logged
illegaloperation
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 777


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: July 02, 2014, 11:56:42 PM »

I doubt that there will be a big drop in African American turnout, but the battlegrounds most affected will be (in descending order): North Carolina, Virginia, Florida, Ohio
Logged
Del Tachi
Republican95
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,863
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.52, S: 1.46

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: July 03, 2014, 12:51:29 AM »

The Democrats could do better among North Carolina Whites in 2016 only to see it slip-out-from-under-them due to decreased Black turnout. 
Logged
Slander and/or Libel
Figs
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,338


Political Matrix
E: -6.32, S: -7.83

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: July 03, 2014, 06:47:05 AM »

The Democrats could do better among North Carolina Whites in 2016 only to see it slip-out-from-under-them due to decreased Black turnout. 

But the traditional problem is decreased black (and other traditionally Democratic leaning constituencies) during midterm elections, not presidential elections. Do we have any reason right now to think there's a chance of a substantial decrease in black turnout in 2016 compared to 2012 or 2008?
Logged
JRP1994
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,048


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: July 03, 2014, 07:14:38 AM »

In this order, from 2012 results:

Florida
Virginia
Ohio
Pennsylvania
Michigan
Nevada

Logged
Suburbia
bronz4141
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,684
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: July 03, 2014, 08:31:40 AM »

My view:
Virginia
Ohio
Florida
Pennsylvania
Michigan
Nevada

If O'Malley or Cuomo don't energize turnout with blacks like Clinton or Biden would, this would happen.
Logged
bedstuy
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,526


Political Matrix
E: -1.16, S: -4.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: July 03, 2014, 10:10:42 AM »

Another thing to consider, there are a lot more black female voters than black male voters.  Hillary could compensate for lost enthusiasm based on racial affinity by increased enthusiasm based on gender affinity.  People aren't just defined by one characteristic after all.
Logged
illegaloperation
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 777


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: July 03, 2014, 12:15:16 PM »

The Democrats could do better among North Carolina Whites in 2016 only to see it slip-out-from-under-them due to decreased Black turnout. 

I doubt that the drop nationwide would be all that significant.

After all, in an odd year (2013), African American turn out for a some dude McAuliffe.
Logged
Likely Voter
Moderators
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,344


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: July 03, 2014, 12:17:59 PM »

One could just as easily ask in what states could a drop in white support for R candidate cause flip to D.

Is any possible drop in black D support greater than potential drop in white support for the Rs?
Logged
Non Swing Voter
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,181


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: July 03, 2014, 05:51:07 PM »

One could just as easily ask in what states could a drop in white support for R candidate cause flip to D.

Is any possible drop in black D support greater than potential drop in white support for the Rs?

To answer your question, I would think the first state to flip would be North Carolina... some others: Arizona, Georgia.
Logged
Mister Mets
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,440
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: July 03, 2014, 10:52:31 PM »

Black turnout will not drop enough to lose any state. People on this site seem to forget that blacks  heavily voted Democrat before Obama.
There are two things to measure here. How many people show up to vote, and who they support.

The latter could stay the same, but a decline in the former would help Republicans.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.057 seconds with 13 queries.