Whose perspective on politics do you prefer...?

[Paul Kemp]

I hope for a good natured discussion regarding these two. Both are incredibly enlightening/amusing/cringeworthy/seemingly parodical but you must chose one.

Please try and take your own ideology out of the equation, as it is a poll featuring a red avatar member versus a blue avatar member.

I look forward to your opinions.

[Joe Republic]

Hard to decide.  They are both Generic American Voter, after all.

[Fmr President & Senator Polnut]

Hard to decide.  They are both Generic American Voter, after all.

No more appropriate posters to have that capitalised than them

[The world will shine with light in our nightmare]

So by "perspective" you don't mean "ideology?"  If that's the case, I don't see much difference between the two.  Both seem to have a longing for Traditional American Values™, but that doesn't make their ideologies similar.

[Eraserhead]

I honestly don't know...

[morgieb]

Suicide.

[Goldwater]

How do we take our own ideology out of the question? Wouldn't our preferred political perspective be directly related to our political ideology?

[Paul Kemp]

How do we take our own ideology out of the question? Wouldn't our preferred political perspective be directly related to our political ideology?

You're thinking too much about it yet missing an important point.

[Goldwater]

How do we take our own ideology out of the question? Wouldn't our preferred political perspective be directly related to our political ideology?

You're thinking too much about it yet missing an important point.

If you know me well enough, that's not really surprising.

[TDAS04]

I honestly don't know...

[Adam Griffin]

[Gustaf]

Well crafted post.

To answer the question in earnest, Reaganfan.

[tik 🪀✨]

Reaganfan's posts have this underlying fear and desperation to them that is beautiful and hilarious.

I don't know Bushie's political perspective well enough to choose him.

[Franzl]

To answer the question in earnest, Reaganfan.

Yes.

No matter how idiotic his views can be, at least he has them. I prefer hacks that believe in something to the totally content free, pseudo independent minded attitude that Bushie constantly demonstrates.

[World politics is up Schmitt creek]

Naso backs up his tragically ludicrous and facile opinions about how the world should work with threadbare anecdotal evidence that can be quite amusing, or even enlightening in a warped sort of way. Bushie constantly vacillates for literally no reason and has more or less admitted to just acting as a conduit for whatever he thinks other people want. Say what you will about Naso's perspective, but it is a perspective. Bushie is the Great American Swing Voter, an in most cases absolutely abject thing to be, and doesn't even have the excuse of being low-information.

[Hatman 🍁]

Bushie. Naso's views are much more vile and destructive.

[afleitch]

Bushie.

He has shown the ability, at least politically to reach different conclusions from those he used to hold. Naso is stuck in a perpetual 'Family Ties' re-run.

[The Dowager Mod]

Bushie.

He has shown the ability, at least politically to reach different conclusions from those he used to hold. Naso is stuck in a perpetual 'Family Ties' re-run.

Bwahahaha

[memphis]

The one who voted for Obama twice.

[Paul Kemp]

Some really great takes here, guys. Good work.

[Oldiesfreak1854]

I like them both, but probably Reaganfan.