MA-Gov: Coakley & Baker: hot, cold, just right?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 18, 2024, 06:10:33 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Gubernatorial/State Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  MA-Gov: Coakley & Baker: hot, cold, just right?		 « previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: MA-Gov: Coakley & Baker: hot, cold, just right?  (Read 1565 times)
RogueBeaver
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,058
Canada
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: July 04, 2014, 07:02:00 PM »
Both trying to show their more personable sides this time around.
Logged
TX Conservative Dem
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,336
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: July 05, 2014, 08:22:05 AM »
Why do I get a feeling Coakley's going to choke again ?
Logged
Maxwell
mah519
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,459
Germany


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: July 05, 2014, 09:40:49 AM »
Quote from: TX Conservative Dem on July 05, 2014, 08:22:05 AM
Why do I get a feeling Coakley's going to choke again ?



Normally I'd disregard your post, but actually she may - Charlie Baker is outraising all of the Dems, including Coakley.
Logged
CatoMinor
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,007
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: July 05, 2014, 10:37:21 AM »
I really want Baker to win, but I just don't see it happening right now.
Logged
TX Conservative Dem
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,336
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: July 05, 2014, 11:48:39 AM »
Baker will have to tie Coakley to Patrick and say a vote for Martha Coakley would be a 3rd term for Patrick.
Logged
free my dawg
SawxDem
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,143
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: July 05, 2014, 11:56:03 AM »
Quote from: TX Conservative Dem on July 05, 2014, 11:48:39 AM
Baker will have to tie Coakley to Patrick and say a vote for Martha Coakley would be a 3rd term for Patrick.



This isn't 2010 anymore. People like Patrick.
Logged
CatoMinor
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,007
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: July 05, 2014, 12:08:49 PM »
Quote from: TX Conservative Dem on July 05, 2014, 11:48:39 AM
Baker will have to tie Coakley to Patrick and say a vote for Martha Coakley would be a 3rd term for Patrick.



No Baker will have to tie Coakley to Coakley.
Logged
NHLiberal
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 790


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: July 05, 2014, 12:44:09 PM »
Quote from: TX Conservative Dem on July 05, 2014, 11:48:39 AM
Baker will have to tie Coakley to Patrick and say a vote for Martha Coakley would be a 3rd term for Patrick.
Logged
Indy Texas
independentTX
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,270
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.52, S: -3.48

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: July 05, 2014, 03:13:04 PM »
How does the presence of the independent candidates (Jeff McCormick, Scott Lively and Evan Falchuk) affect the race? Will any of them match of exceed Cahill's 2010 performance?
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,704


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: July 05, 2014, 08:25:00 PM »
Why did Democrats decide to go with a proven loser?
Logged
NHLiberal
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 790


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: July 05, 2014, 11:07:14 PM »
Quote from: ○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└ on July 05, 2014, 08:25:00 PM
Why did Democrats decide to go with a proven loser?
Logged
TX Conservative Dem
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,336
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: July 06, 2014, 01:41:18 PM »
What about the down ballot statewide offices?
Logged
Small Business Owner of Any Repute
Mr. Moderate
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,431
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: July 06, 2014, 01:43:05 PM »
Quote from: ○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└ on July 05, 2014, 08:25:00 PM
Why did Democrats decide to go with a proven loser?

Because the best time for a proven Democratic loser to redeem herself is against a proven Republican loser.
Logged
Small Business Owner of Any Repute
Mr. Moderate
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,431
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: July 06, 2014, 01:49:42 PM »
Quote from: TX Conservative Dem on July 06, 2014, 01:41:18 PM
What about the down ballot statewide offices?

What about them? If Mary Connaughton couldn't win her race for Auditor in 2010, what hope does anyone else have?
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.032 seconds with 12 queries.