NE1: Amended Pornography Liberalization Act (Law)

[SWE]

You must be logged in to read this quote.

Sponsor: Governor Talleyrand

Debate on this bill will last for 72 hours, or until 5:56 PM on Wednesday July 9, unless modified or extended. The sponsor has 36 hours to advocate for this proposed legislation. If he does not, this bill will be tabled as there is other pending legislation in the queue.

[Napoleon]

We might as well repeal section two while we are at it, right?

[SWE]

I can't support any bill that repeals the Pornography Liberalization Act. If a parent doesn't want their child looking at porn, it's their responsibility, not the government's.

[Dr. Cynic]

I'd like to hear from the Governor before I make my decision. Is there any reason why he wants to repeal the porno liberalization?

[sentinel]

Hello!

The Governor is sponsoring the bill on my behalf, so you can direct questions to me.

THIS is the current law that was passed last session (below):

You must be logged in to read this quote.

First, I have made it look nicer. Second and more importantly, I removed Part 2 (above). Part 2 (above, in the quote I provided) makes it legal for (seemingly) anyone to have sex with someone under 5, and is pretty much in conflict with Part 3.

Removing this Part 2 (which is what Talleyrand sponsored for me) makes this bill cleaner and obviously more morally okay.

Let me point out that I think the intent of the bill was something else and not to make sex with kids legal. I think someone just made a typo or didn't read it entirely.


@Swe - This repeals the Pornography Liberalization Act and replaces it with ALMOST the same exact text as I've explained.

[Prince of Salem]

Question: what's exactly the point of Part 2 of the Pornography Liberalization Act? I've heard the argument before that it allows anyone to have sex with someone under 5, but as I read it, it doesn't seem to say that. But despite that, it is almost illegible. So... please explain ^^

[sentinel]

Question: what's exactly the point of Part 2 of the Pornography Liberalization Act? I've heard the argument before that it allows anyone to have sex with someone under 5, but as I read it, it doesn't seem to say that. But despite that, it is almost illegible. So... please explain ^^

The point of Part 2 of the original bill is irrelevant because, I believe (I'm giving the benefit of a doubt here) it was accidentally written incoherently and not in the way intended by whoever wrote it. I think it was an accident. Regardless, what it actually says should not be legal. My bill strikes it from the record.

[Dr. Cynic]

I'm fine with it.

[Napoleon]

I'm offering an amendment to remove section 2 clause 2.

[sentinel]

I'm offering an amendment to remove section 2 clause 2.

Its redundant so thats fine with me

[SWE]

The debate period is now over. We will now proceed to a vote on this bill, as written:

You must be logged in to read this quote.

This vote will last for 48 hours or until all Representatives have voted.

[sentinel]

The debate period is now over. We will now proceed to a vote on this bill, as written:

You must be logged in to read this quote.

This vote will last for 48 hours or until all Representatives have voted.

No. You did it wrong. I agreed to Napoleon's amendment.

[Napoleon]

Aye

[Dr. Cynic]

Aye

[sentinel]

Since Napoleon already voted, I do not believe I am permitted to vote

[BaconBacon96]

Aye.

[SWE]

Aye

[SWE]

The voting period is now over. By a vote of 4-0-1, this bill goes to the governor for his signature or veto.

[SWE]

The governor has signed this bill into law