foreign 'leaders' that should be dealt with

[WalterMitty]

hopefully, we can someday overturn that silly executive order that bans executions of foreign leaders.  im strongly against the death penalty, but i do support executions of despots that clearly threaten regional and/or world security.

here is the list of leaders that need to be dealt with first:

assad
castro
chavez
mugabe
the little demigod of north korea

[Jake]

Couldn't agree more, but add Crown Prince Abdullah

[Rob]

I agree with that list, but I would add Chirac.

JK!!! (Sort of )

[opebo]

hopefully, we can someday overturn that silly executive order that bans executions of foreign leaders.  im strongly against the death penalty, but i do support executions of despots that clearly threaten regional and/or world security.

here is the list of leaders that need to be dealt with first:

assad
castro
chavez
mugabe
the little demigod of north korea

Why do you interest yourself in those people, Mitty?  What do they have to do with the US?

[Jake]

Why do you interest yourself in those people, Mitty?  What do they have to do with the US?

NixonNow-Prick who supports the Iraqi insurgents and oppreses Lebanese

Castro-A maniac who "oppreses" the "underclass".

Chavez-A dictator who supports terrorists

Mugabe-see Castro, although you like him because he's a racist

Kim Jong il-Rumored to have nuclear weapons, very unstable

[phk]

We should take out religous leaders first.

[opebo]

Why do you interest yourself in those people, Mitty?  What do they have to do with the US?

NixonNow-Prick who supports the Iraqi insurgents and oppreses Lebanese

You mean he supports the brave men who are resisting the American invasion of their country?  And protects Lebanese against Isreali agression?

You must be logged in to read this quote.

No, he oppressed the owning class - they all had to flee to Florida. (Lesson - institute redistributive Keynesian Capitalism before you get run out of the country)

You must be logged in to read this quote.

What?  Which terrorists?  Maybe you're thinking of Musharraf or the Saudis.

You must be logged in to read this quote.

Who cares if someone is getting oppressed in some other country?

You must be logged in to read this quote.

Sounds like GW.  Besides, if Iraq had had nuclear weapons they would still be an independent country - lesson learned eh?

[Jake]

You must be logged in to read this quote.

What?  Which terrorists?  Maybe you're thinking of Musharraf or the Saudis.

Chavez plans to meet with Iranian leaders and his associates have been linked to arms sales to the Taliban and Columbian drug lords.

[opebo]

You must be logged in to read this quote.

What?  Which terrorists?  Maybe you're thinking of Musharraf or the Saudis.

Chavez plans to meet with Iranian leaders and his associates have been linked to arms sales to the Taliban and Columbian drug lords.

Well, you know how I feel about drug lords.  As for the Iranians, they're no more 'terrorists' than the US troops in Iraq.  They're just our 'enemies'.

[Hitchabrut]

Musharraf is not a terrorist supporter. He just needs to keep as cordial with them as possible or he's dead.

[Bono]

Iraqi insurgents

What would you do if your country was invaded?

[Jake]

Iraqi insurgents

What would you do if your country was invaded?

Blow up my countrymen for sure /sarcasm

[Bono]

Iraqi insurgents

What would you do if your country was invaded?

Blow up my countrymen for sure /sarcasm

The iraqui resistance is not an entire group, and plus many resistences around the world, including the french resistance in wwII attacked colaborationists.

[Jake]

The iraqui resistance is not an entire group, and plus many resistences around the world, including the french resistance in wwII attacked colaborationists.

Random bombs placed that kill innocents who aren't fighting to make their country better are what these "insurgents" are using. As a guerilla force, the police, guard, and American forces are legitimate targets, not civilians.

[opebo]

The iraqui resistance is not an entire group, and plus many resistences around the world, including the french resistance in wwII attacked colaborationists.

Random bombs placed that kill innocents who aren't fighting to make their country better are what these "insurgents" are using. As a guerilla force, the police, guard, and American forces are legitimate targets, not civilians.

You're applying a double standard - the American invaders cause all sorts of 'collateral damage' as well.

Besides some of those 'civilians' are in fact collaberators.

[I spent the winter writing songs about getting better]

I just wish the insurgents would target people that would make Iraq a better place, like blowing up that worthless asswipe Ali Sistani. Killing every member in parliment of that Shiite theocracy party would be a good move too. If the CIA really had Iraq and the US's interests in mind, Sistani and almost all Shiite leaders would be dead by now.

[12th Doctor]

hopefully, we can someday overturn that silly executive order that bans executions of foreign leaders.  im strongly against the death penalty, but i do support executions of despots that clearly threaten regional and/or world security.

here is the list of leaders that need to be dealt with first:

assad
castro
chavez
mugabe
the little demigod of north korea

Come on.  NixonNow isn't that bad.