Confirmation hearing: Simfan for Attorney General (Failed) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 30, 2024, 08:58:20 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Government (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  Confirmation hearing: Simfan for Attorney General (Failed) (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Confirmation hearing: Simfan for Attorney General (Failed)  (Read 2424 times)
Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee
North Carolina Yankee
Moderator
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 54,118
United States


« on: July 15, 2014, 10:02:56 AM »

Remember when DemPGH became AG because Bacon King didn't show up before the Senate?

Yes Smiley


Since he has shown up, it was done seperately from the others and there was confusion about the necessity of it, I will give him the benefit of a doubt on his late appearence.

So AYE
Logged
Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee
North Carolina Yankee
Moderator
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 54,118
United States


« Reply #1 on: July 16, 2014, 10:01:42 AM »

Simfan was just nominated to be the wiki update guy, snowstalker being the legal advisor.

I, too don't have anything against simfan, and also have a well known pretty lax view on confirmations. Generally speaking, if someone turns up and isn't utterly appalling, I'll confirm, but simfan didn't turn up. If Dempgh nominates him again and he does turn up, I definitely might reconsider.

Perhaps my view of the thing was distorted slightly by the fact that I didn't see the thread until after the vote had started, one reason why there were no questions asked save for by shua. Shua's question was the only one bothered to be asked before the vote was started and shua was satisfied enough to vote Aye upon Simfan's subsequent response. He also responded to the President's question as well. Had I voted at the start and not subsequent to those responses, I too would have voted NAy pending his response to the questions asked. However it looked like the concerns had been addressed and my concern was avoiding unnecessary delays with regards to the President's cabinet thus.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.019 seconds with 12 queries.