In order to remain competitive, the GOP needs to do better with Hispanics, which would lead to a lot of the Democratic trending western states to flip back.
At the same time, I thing that the Democratic trend in the coastal south (Virginia, North Carolina, and Georgia) will continue.
In this way I like maps 2 and 3 better (which are effectively the same, really). However, I don't think the Democrats will collapse in the Midwest. The Republicans will be competitive there with the right candidate or the right environment, but I don't see the case for a Republican trend there.
The map gives Democrats an edge in a 50/50 election like today, however re-allocation of EVs will likely boost the Republicans a bit.
If the Republicans do well reaching out to Hispanics, they will at least do substantially better amongst blacks. Maybe they will go from 12:1 and 2:1 respectively to 3:1 and 5:4 respectively?
It will be a tall order for the GOP to do better among blacks after the way they treated the first black president.
No one will be voting based on Obama's tenure in 2024 and probably not in 2022 or 2020 either. Even G.W. Bush, who left office with ~25% approval isn't an issue in 2014 and was only a minor issue in 2012. Consider what happened to the Catholic vote after Kennedy and Johnson (symbolically a re-election of Kennedy for all extents and purposes)
http://cara.georgetown.edu/presidential%20vote%20only.pdf 2024 would be equivalent to 1976 here, and Nixon had already
won the Catholic vote in '72! Now Catholic identity is obviously less cohesive than black identity, but keep in mind that the Catholic vote had basically never gone decisively R before.