Recent development most dangerous to U.S. nat'l security? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 01, 2024, 05:40:47 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Individual Politics (Moderator: The Dowager Mod)
  Recent development most dangerous to U.S. nat'l security? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: ?
#1
Rise of ISIL/the Islamic State
 
#2
Shootdown of MH17/Russians in Ukraine
 
#3
Israeli invasion of Gaza
 
#4
West African ebola outbreak
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 47

Author Topic: Recent development most dangerous to U.S. nat'l security?  (Read 1493 times)
Beet
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,915


« on: July 23, 2014, 02:41:02 PM »

Option 4, by far.
Logged
Beet
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,915


« Reply #1 on: July 23, 2014, 03:11:48 PM »

Option 2.  While Option 4 is quite bad, I don't see where a continuing outbreak would be able to occur in the US as we're not culturally wedded to burial practices that have contributed to the long-lasting nature of the West African outbreak.

That seems like a convenient scapegoat. While burial practices have certainly contributed to the spread of the disease, in late June/early June, it was reported that the World Health Organization identified three main causes of the epidemic. Cultural practices was one, but the other two were dense populations and cross-border trade. The US certainly has dense populations and a lot of cross-border movement.

Furthermore, some of the behavioral problems seen in West Africa today are not cultural but rational.

(a) people are afraid to seek out health from health workers. This is rational because health workers cannot cure or even substantially ameliorate the disease; going to a treatment center only increases the chances that you will be infected, whereas a person merely showing symptoms might not be infected at all. There is nothing culturally specific about this problem. This is the main behavioral problem, because the primary means of fighting ebola today is isolation and containment. Yet when people do not seek out health workers, they cannot be isolated and potential transmission chains cannot be tracked down.

(b) health workers themselves refusing to treat the sick. This is rational because of the high level of contagiousness of the disease. There are not enough biohazard level 4 labs around the world to send all the sick to these places.
Logged
Beet
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,915


« Reply #2 on: July 24, 2014, 10:37:02 PM »

Ebola is a very contagious disease, if you come into contact with it you can get infected, even if you butcher an animal with the disease or come into contact of a dead person who had the disease when they were alive, you can get infected. It's usually in rural areas, but it's spread to dozens of towns and cities across western Africa. The symptoms are red eyes and a skin rash, it's very difficult to tell from other diseases since those are very common signs of other diseases, over 1000 people have gotten the disease and nearly 90% of the time, a person who gets infected with the disease dies. It's just a matter of time before someone infected with the disease gets on an airplane and spreads it to other people. This disease is very deadly and I think a lot of you are underestimating how fast it can spread.

Thank you. Finally someone else here gets it.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.029 seconds with 14 queries.