Recent development most dangerous to U.S. nat'l security? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 01, 2024, 06:01:16 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Individual Politics (Moderator: The Dowager Mod)
  Recent development most dangerous to U.S. nat'l security? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: ?
#1
Rise of ISIL/the Islamic State
 
#2
Shootdown of MH17/Russians in Ukraine
 
#3
Israeli invasion of Gaza
 
#4
West African ebola outbreak
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 47

Author Topic: Recent development most dangerous to U.S. nat'l security?  (Read 1494 times)
Paul Kemp
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,230
United States
« on: July 25, 2014, 08:38:04 AM »

Um...what? How are a Jihadist state and an event that will incite Jihadists not dangerous to the US? Remember Osama's stated reasons for attacking the US?

The difference between ISIS and Osama bin Laden is that the FBI has not (yet) trained ISIS.

There are so many things wrong in this post.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.029 seconds with 14 queries.