1968: Nixon picks Fong instead of Agnew
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 26, 2024, 05:28:12 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Election What-ifs?
  Past Election What-ifs (US) (Moderator: Dereich)
  1968: Nixon picks Fong instead of Agnew
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: 1968: Nixon picks Fong instead of Agnew  (Read 1011 times)
TDAS04
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,543
Bhutan


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: July 31, 2014, 11:00:20 AM »

Richard Nixon selects Senator Hiram Fong of Hawaii as his running mate.  The Humphrey/Muskie and Wallace/LeMay tickets occur as IRL.

How would this election have turned out?
Logged
King
intermoderate
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,356
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: July 31, 2014, 11:41:47 AM »

No effect whatsoever but since he wasn't corrupt like Agnew he would've ended up President in 1974.
Logged
TDAS04
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,543
Bhutan


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: July 31, 2014, 11:57:12 AM »

No effect whatsoever but since he wasn't corrupt like Agnew he would've ended up President in 1974.

This is 1968, and Fong was of Chinese origin.  I think there would have been an opening for Wallace.
Logged
badgate
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,466


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: August 01, 2014, 12:08:50 AM »

No effect whatsoever but since he wasn't corrupt like Agnew he would've ended up President in 1974.

Ooh, that's more interesting though: Carter vs. Fong in '76.
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,735


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: August 01, 2014, 12:21:12 AM »

I think it would hurt Nixon and help Wallace. Not sure how much.
If Nixon failed to get a majority of the electoral votes, he'd probably also lose the popular vote, and so the 26 state delegations with a Democratic majority elected for the next Congress would choose Humphrey.
Logged
King
intermoderate
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,356
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: August 01, 2014, 09:45:00 AM »

No effect whatsoever but since he wasn't corrupt like Agnew he would've ended up President in 1974.

Ooh, that's more interesting though: Carter vs. Fong in '76.

Fong probably wouldn't have been able to beat Reagan in the 76 primaries. Ford barely did.
Logged
TDAS04
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,543
Bhutan


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: August 01, 2014, 05:39:52 PM »



Humphrey/Muskie:  225
Nixon/Fong:  222
Wallace/LeMay:  91

No candidate obtains an EV majority. 
Logged
Jerseyrules
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,544
United States


Political Matrix
E: 10.00, S: -4.26

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: August 02, 2014, 04:43:11 PM »

It'd probably hurt Nixon, siphoning off his support in the Deep South, which would coalesce around Wallace.  It might help a bit in the Northeast, but not by much; though he was supported by many in the Rockefeller wing of the party, Fong wasn't well-known on the national stage.  Recorded video is hard to come by, but he's definitely not going to have the impact the border-state firebrand Agnew did.  Before the tax evasion scandals came out, many viewed him as next-in-line to Nixon, and like Connelly was supported by both the conservative wing of the party while the Rockefeller wing still would have held their nose for him.



Nixon: 287
Humphrey: 174
Wallace: 77
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.033 seconds with 12 queries.