How Suburban Are Big American Cities?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 05:59:42 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Geography & Demographics (Moderators: muon2, 100% pro-life no matter what)
  How Suburban Are Big American Cities?
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: How Suburban Are Big American Cities?  (Read 957 times)
cinyc
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,721


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: May 21, 2015, 07:07:38 PM »

How Suburban Are Big American Cities?
FiveThirtyEight.com/Jed Kolko
Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Interesting read. 

Not all "city growth" is created equal - or automatically benefits Democrats.  Suburban-heavy cities are growing faster than more urban ones.  Suburban-oriented growth, especially in the South, may be more Republican than Democrat-leaning.
Logged
Padfoot
padfoot714
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,532
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.58, S: -6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: May 21, 2015, 07:59:07 PM »

Definitely a good read.  I wish they would have posted maps for more cities though.
Logged
Skill and Chance
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,680
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: May 21, 2015, 08:02:26 PM »

It's complicated.  In the case of Southern suburbs, as the sprawl encroaches on formerly rural areas, the newcomers will generally be Republicans.  But the net effect is expanding business moderate vs. social conservative influence.  These people may not be liberals, but they can and will tell candidates like Santorum and Huckabee off in a way that the locals won't.  A bunch of moderate Republicans could be just what Texas and NC need.
Logged
bgwah
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,833
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.03, S: -6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: August 26, 2015, 03:10:31 PM »

What would be a better way to measure urban growth? 1,000 people people per square mile to 1,500 is a 50% increase. But 50,000 to 70,000 is only a 40% increase. Obviously, the second is a much better example of real urban growth. But how do you quantify that?
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.205 seconds with 11 queries.