MN/MI: Which state is more vulnerable going forward?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 25, 2024, 01:07:05 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Presidential Election Trends (Moderator: 100% pro-life no matter what)
  MN/MI: Which state is more vulnerable going forward?
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Which state is more vulnerable?
#1
Minnesota
 
#2
Michigan
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 42

Author Topic: MN/MI: Which state is more vulnerable going forward?  (Read 3105 times)
Mr. Illini
liberty142
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,847
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.26, S: -3.30

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: August 11, 2014, 12:22:52 AM »

Well? I say Michigan.
Logged
eric82oslo
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,501
Norway


Political Matrix
E: -6.00, S: -5.65

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: August 11, 2014, 02:54:48 AM »

Michigan, as some kind of a failed state, is obviously vulnerable. Especially towards flirting with Rand Paul. However, it got its auto industry giving it a solid Democratic boost. In the short term I'd say Michigan, but in the longer term perhaps Minnesota?
Logged
henster
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,988


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: August 11, 2014, 03:18:11 AM »

Michigan, as some kind of a failed state, is obviously vulnerable. Especially towards flirting with Rand Paul. However, it got its auto industry giving it a solid Democratic boost. In the short term I'd say Michigan, but in the longer term perhaps Minnesota?

What makes you think Rand Paul could carry Michigan? Didn't he oppose the auto bailout?
Logged
TDAS04
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,538
Bhutan


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: August 11, 2014, 03:44:09 AM »

Michigan.  The Democratic-voting base in Minnesota is more solid, while Michigan is swingier.
Logged
eric82oslo
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,501
Norway


Political Matrix
E: -6.00, S: -5.65

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: August 11, 2014, 03:48:45 AM »

Michigan, as some kind of a failed state, is obviously vulnerable. Especially towards flirting with Rand Paul. However, it got its auto industry giving it a solid Democratic boost. In the short term I'd say Michigan, but in the longer term perhaps Minnesota?

What makes you think Rand Paul could carry Michigan? Didn't he oppose the auto bailout?

I didn't say he could carry it, just make it more competitive than usual.
Logged
sg0508
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,058
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: August 11, 2014, 08:27:57 AM »

I think they're both similar at this point, but I agree with others in that the MN Democratic base seems more stubborn and always seems to come through for the Democrats at the Presidential level.

In a very good GOP year (with a good economy---> crucial for winning those Detroit suburbs), MI could tilt.
Logged
JRP1994
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,048


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: August 11, 2014, 09:04:55 AM »

The more Republican PVI is in bold.

Year          Michigan PVI          Minnesota PVI
1964              D+11.03                     D+5.18
1968              D+7.43                      D+13.23
1972              D+8.76                      D+17.64
1976              R+7.45                      D+10.81
1980              R+3.25                      D+13.68
1984              R+0.77                      D+18.40
1988              R+0.17                      D+14.75
1992              D+1.84                      D+6.07
1996              D+4.69                      D+7.62
2000              D+4.61                       D+1.88
2004              D+5.88                      D+5.94
2008              D+9.18                       D+2.98
2012              D+5.61                       D+3.83
Logged
Obama-Biden Democrat
Zyzz
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,828


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: August 11, 2014, 06:59:15 PM »

The collapse of the Michigan economy and the long term destruction of Michigan's auto and other industrial sectors  worries me more than Minnesota.

The percent of union members as part of the country and especially in the rust belt states like Ohio and Michigan has been declining since the 50's.  Michigan has a lot of the stereotypical socially conservative gun owner who votes Democrat based on the fact that they are in a union. If that good union job is gone, it would not surprise me to see these types of voters swing Republican long term.

Logged
Miles
MilesC56
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,325
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: August 12, 2014, 08:49:59 AM »

Michigan.  The Democratic-voting base in Minnesota is more solid, while Michigan is swingier.
Logged
SNJ1985
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,277
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.19, S: 7.57

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: August 12, 2014, 10:54:53 AM »

Who benefited most from Michigan's population decline from 2005 to 2012? Democrats or Republicans?
Logged
MATTROSE94
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,803
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -5.29, S: -6.43

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: August 12, 2014, 11:31:24 AM »

Who benefited most from Michigan's population decline from 2005 to 2012? Democrats or Republicans?
I would say the Republicans.
Logged
Rockefeller GOP
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,936
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: August 12, 2014, 01:00:01 PM »

Who benefited most from Michigan's population decline from 2005 to 2012? Democrats or Republicans?
I would say the Republicans.

Probably.  A lot of blue collar jobs have left the state while most suburban White flight has moved away from Detroit but stayed in state.
Logged
DS0816
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,142
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: August 14, 2014, 07:48:20 PM »

A Republican is going to have to win by at least six percent points in the U.S. Popular Vote to be able to flip either one.
Logged
dmmidmi
dmwestmi
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,095
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: August 15, 2014, 07:50:09 AM »

Who benefited most from Michigan's population decline from 2005 to 2012? Democrats or Republicans?
I would say the Republicans.

Probably.  A lot of blue collar jobs have left the state while most suburban White flight has moved away from Detroit but stayed in state.

Actually, the answer may be "neither": http://www.mlive.com/news/index.ssf/2013/03/database_see_which_michigan_co.html

Some traditionally Democratic counties (Lake, Marquette, Washtenaw) gained population, while some traditionally Republican counties (Kent, Livingston, Ottawa) gained population. And vice versa.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.043 seconds with 13 queries.