With retirements, Michigan's influence set to fade
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 18, 2024, 06:03:02 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  With retirements, Michigan's influence set to fade
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: With retirements, Michigan's influence set to fade  (Read 379 times)
Miles
MilesC56
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,325
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: August 12, 2014, 08:41:59 AM »

Article.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
Logged
dmmidmi
dmwestmi
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,095
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: August 12, 2014, 08:56:35 AM »

Remember though, John Conyers, Sander Levin, and Fred Upton will all still be employed next year, and each of them has been in the House forever.

It's entirely possible that Debbie Dingell is friends with her husband's friends, and may inherit a whole host of powerful connections.

I get the feeling that if Sen. Levin wasn't retiring, this article wouldn't have been written. I didn't see this article written when Stupak, Hoekstra, and Ehlers all retired at the same time--with Dale Kildee following two years later.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.023 seconds with 11 queries.