IDS 1: IDS Save our Utilites Act (Passed) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 11:19:19 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Government
  Regional Governments (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  IDS 1: IDS Save our Utilites Act (Passed) (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: IDS 1: IDS Save our Utilites Act (Passed)  (Read 1746 times)
Dereich
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,908


« on: August 12, 2014, 06:42:59 PM »
« edited: September 05, 2014, 01:40:07 AM by Speaker Dereich »

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Sponsor: Speaker Dereich


I ask unanimous consent to move this bill to a final vote.
Logged
Dereich
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,908


« Reply #1 on: August 13, 2014, 06:49:16 PM »

With unanimous consent I move this bill to a final vote; legislators have 48 hours or until all have voted to vote aye, nay or to abstain.

Quote from: Restricted
You must be logged in to read this quote.
Logged
Dereich
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,908


« Reply #2 on: August 13, 2014, 07:13:07 PM »

Aye
Logged
Dereich
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,908


« Reply #3 on: August 15, 2014, 06:49:55 PM »

With three votes in favor and one legislator not voting, this bill passes the IDS Legislature and is sent to the Emperor for signature or veto.

To be honest, this was a rushed bill meant more than anything else to be passed and ready before the nationalization occurred. Now that it looks like we have a bit more time I definitely agree that this bill could and should be amended. SJoyce's wording is more concise and relevant; I agree with his suggestion that this bill be vetoed and we adopt something along those lines.
Logged
Dereich
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,908


« Reply #4 on: August 15, 2014, 11:17:28 PM »

As for redrafting, I'd be fine just adopting SJoyce's amendment, but I'd also be open to expanding from just acting as a counter to the senate bill to include other utilities or businesses that might be targeted.
Logged
Dereich
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,908


« Reply #5 on: August 16, 2014, 05:30:07 PM »

Why not expand cooperative opportunities to provide competition to utilities and utilize that Smart Grid Act we passed two years ago or so as a means to facilitate it. That will eliminate any justification for nationalization.

The justification for nationalization is that a group of dogmatic ideologists want to do so as a stepping stone for total control of the economy; if the current Senate proposal was based on any kind of need or practicality we wouldn't need to be discussing this here. Your suggestion might make practical sense and could be added as an additional amendment or in another bill, but even if it was implemented nationwide it wouldn't stop the radicals in the Senate from pursuing total nationalization, necessitating our own response.
Logged
Dereich
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,908


« Reply #6 on: August 21, 2014, 02:08:22 AM »

I, for one, am happy to adopt Sjoyce's amendment wholesale and leave the other questions for future bills. Any objections?
Logged
Dereich
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,908


« Reply #7 on: September 01, 2014, 02:59:37 AM »

No, sorry. I'm in favor of moving almost immediately with Sjoyce's revision. Its nowhere near as pressing anymore, but there's always a risk that Labor will come back and try again.
Logged
Dereich
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,908


« Reply #8 on: September 03, 2014, 12:46:55 AM »

I hereby bring this bill to a final vote. Legislators have 48 hours or until all have voted to vote Aye, Nay or to Abstain.


Quote from: Restricted
You must be logged in to read this quote.
Logged
Dereich
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,908


« Reply #9 on: September 04, 2014, 01:12:26 AM »

Aye
Logged
Dereich
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,908


« Reply #10 on: September 05, 2014, 01:39:43 AM »

With four ayes and one legislator abstaining this bill passes in the IDS Legislature and is sent to the Emperor for signature or veto.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.027 seconds with 13 queries.