1904 Presidential Election (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 02:04:22 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Individual Politics (Moderator: The Dowager Mod)
  1904 Presidential Election (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Who would you have voted for?
#1
Theodore Roosevelt (Republican)
 
#2
Alton Parker (Democratic)
 
#3
Eugene Debs (Socialist)
 
#4
Silas Swallow (Prohibition)
 
#5
Thomas Watson (Populist)
 
#6
Other/Write-in
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 37

Author Topic: 1904 Presidential Election  (Read 1629 times)
Rockefeller GOP
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,936
United States


« on: August 13, 2014, 12:28:57 PM »

Teddy, no contest.
Logged
Rockefeller GOP
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,936
United States


« Reply #1 on: August 16, 2014, 07:32:30 PM »

Why the leftist love for TR? Parker ran to his left.

Parker was a Bourbon Democrat, Roosevelt was a Progressive. Sure, Parker opposed imperialism but he was for cutting government expenditures and opposing tariffs.

Opposing a high tariff would, at the time, be a more populist position than favoring a high protective tariff.  It was a policy that benefited big corporations a ton, hence the GOP's loyal support for them.
Logged
Rockefeller GOP
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,936
United States


« Reply #2 on: August 17, 2014, 12:51:01 PM »

Opposing a high tariff would, at the time, be a more populist position than favoring a high protective tariff.  It was a policy that benefited big corporations a ton, hence the GOP's loyal support for them.
Not necessarily. Lower tariffs were supported by Populists, but also (and more vigorously) by conservative Bourbon Democrats.


The point is that the GOP (in my opinion, the more fiscally "conservative" party since its inception but at LEAST since 1896) supported a high tariff on pro-business principles.  It was certainly something populists attacked.  If I were to guess, Bourbon Democrats opposed it for partisan and electoral reasons.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.024 seconds with 14 queries.