If all 50 states went to war, which one would win? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 01, 2024, 02:27:01 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Individual Politics (Moderator: The Dowager Mod)
  If all 50 states went to war, which one would win? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: If all 50 states went to war, which one would win?
#1
Alabama
 
#2
Alaska
 
#3
Arizona
 
#4
Arkansas
 
#5
California
 
#6
Colorado
 
#7
Conncticut
 
#8
Delaware
 
#9
Florida
 
#10
Georgia
 
#11
Hawaii
 
#12
Idaho
 
#13
Illinois
 
#14
Indiana
 
#15
Iowa
 
#16
Kansas
 
#17
Kentucky
 
#18
Louisiana
 
#19
Maine
 
#20
Maryland
 
#21
Massachusetts
 
#22
Michigan
 
#23
Minnesota
 
#24
Mississippi
 
#25
Missouri
 
#26
Montana
 
#27
Nebraska
 
#28
Nevada
 
#29
New Hampshire
 
#30
New Jersey
 
#31
New Mexico
 
#32
New York
 
#33
North Carolina
 
#34
North Dakota
 
#35
Ohio
 
#36
Oklahoma
 
#37
Oregon
 
#38
Pennsylvania
 
#39
Rhode Island
 
#40
South Carolina
 
#41
South Dakota
 
#42
Tennessee
 
#43
Texas
 
#44
Utah
 
#45
Vermont
 
#46
Virginia
 
#47
Washington
 
#48
West Virginia
 
#49
Wisconsin
 
#50
Wyoming
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 65

Author Topic: If all 50 states went to war, which one would win?  (Read 2115 times)
Redalgo
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,681
United States


WWW
« on: August 23, 2014, 12:27:43 PM »

It depends on which states' leaders are willing to go how far to win. In theory it could be whichever state gets its hands on the President's football first, whichever is quickest in salvaging fissile material from the warheads to create radiological weapons, or - in the case of Georgia - the government's willingness (or lack thereof) to risk setting off a global smallpox pandemic.

Even the slightest of possibilities of in-fighting between American republics illustrates once again how utterly batsh**t insane it is for a country to maintain advanced, sizable arsenals of WMDs.

It would not be a long enough conflict - hours or at most a few days - so the populations, economies, and technological prowess of each state would have negligible affects on the outcomes. If you want to explore another hypothetical of the states creating alliances I guess it would get a lot more complicated.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.034 seconds with 13 queries.