Is R/D divide becoming more about metro areas than regions?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 16, 2024, 12:42:42 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Presidential Election Trends (Moderator: 100% pro-life no matter what)
  Is R/D divide becoming more about metro areas than regions?
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Is R/D divide becoming more about metro areas than regions?  (Read 1228 times)
Non Swing Voter
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,181


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: August 18, 2014, 07:51:48 PM »

e.g., states with large metro areas and surrounding states for the most part will continue voting (D) while states without large metro areas for the most part will not.

Large metro area examples = New York, LA, SF, Chicago, DC, Philadelphia, Miami, Atlanta, Houston, Dallas, Seattle, Detroit, Denver, Boston... etc.

Obviously some states with large metro areas such as Texas will probably continue to vote (R), while some states like New Mexico will probably continue to vote (D)... however, this seems to correlate better than regions.
Logged
ElectionsGuy
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,106
United States


Political Matrix
E: 7.10, S: -7.65

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: August 19, 2014, 06:31:17 PM »

Nah, I think areas like Phoenix, San Diego, and every metro in the South prove this not to be the case. Southern metros are fundamentally different from Midwest and Northeast metros.
Logged
Skill and Chance
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,626
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: August 19, 2014, 07:19:47 PM »

Well, we're not there yet, but we probably will get there in the next 10 years.  The R hold on FL/NC/GA/AZ will eventually slip away, as will the D hold on the more rural midwestern states and (eventually, I think) Northern New England.
Logged
Skill and Chance
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,626
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: August 31, 2014, 04:53:53 PM »

Well, we're not there yet, but we probably will get there in the next 10 years.  The R hold on FL/NC/GA/AZ will eventually slip away, as will the D hold on the more rural midwestern states and (eventually, I think) Northern New England.

This will obviously be a net win for Democrats as they will gain more electoral votes from this equation than Republicans will. 


Would also be helpful in the House if they could eventually take full control of redistricting in a lot of large states.  But it would make a Senate majority almost impossible.  Although I would probably rather have control of the House than the Senate between the two.
Logged
Mr. Illini
liberty142
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,847
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.26, S: -3.30

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: September 01, 2014, 09:45:47 PM »

The divide has always existed, but the fact is that certain metros are more conservative than others, and this can play a major factor. For example, Wisconsin would not be considered to be a swing state were its suburbs to vote more like the suburbs of Boston or even Chicago. Large metros exist in Tennessee and Arizona and Texas, but these states will remain Republican not because they necessarily a smaller portion of the population (sometimes it is so, other times not) but because they aren't overwhelmingly Democratic enough to flip the state.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.03 seconds with 11 queries.