Peace and Prosperity Act of 2014 (Voting on Amendment) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 03:16:34 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Government (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  Peace and Prosperity Act of 2014 (Voting on Amendment) (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Peace and Prosperity Act of 2014 (Voting on Amendment)  (Read 8754 times)
MyRescueKittehRocks
JohanusCalvinusLibertas
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,763
United States


« on: August 20, 2014, 08:47:47 PM »

Most know me as rather dovish on foreign policy. Needless to say I must oppose this bill. Cutting defense spending by 75 percent while our enemies abroad are building up is totally not wise at all. No nation is meant to be the policemen of the world. The reality is we need a strong national defense and this bill destroys that. I urge the Senate to defeat this bill and if I come to the senate I will vote against it.
Logged
MyRescueKittehRocks
JohanusCalvinusLibertas
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,763
United States


« Reply #1 on: August 24, 2014, 07:41:14 AM »


I call for a vote on said amendment.
Logged
MyRescueKittehRocks
JohanusCalvinusLibertas
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,763
United States


« Reply #2 on: August 24, 2014, 10:31:21 AM »


Too late, and you're not in the Senate (and probably never will be) so you have no ability to call for a vote on the amendment.

Could the Secretary of International Affairs give us an idea of what bases would be prudent to close and which ones wouldn't? Or does he think our current base numbers abroad are worth preserving?

You can't adopt an amendment without a vote of the senate.
Logged
MyRescueKittehRocks
JohanusCalvinusLibertas
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,763
United States


« Reply #3 on: August 24, 2014, 06:19:03 PM »


I though I saw an objection  Senator Cynic made an objection.  That's why I thought a vote was called for.
Logged
MyRescueKittehRocks
JohanusCalvinusLibertas
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,763
United States


« Reply #4 on: August 29, 2014, 10:16:03 PM »

The amendment has been adopted.

I would like to hear from the SecIntAffairs to figure out what needs to be changed to honor our existing treaty obligations.

Lumine and Cassius contest the amendment. So you can't adopt the amendment.
Logged
MyRescueKittehRocks
JohanusCalvinusLibertas
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,763
United States


« Reply #5 on: September 07, 2014, 10:49:46 AM »

The amendment has enough votes to pass. Senators have 24 hours to change their votes.



Quote from: Restricted
You must be logged in to read this quote.



Merging the army and marines is not plausible given they serve different roles.
Logged
MyRescueKittehRocks
JohanusCalvinusLibertas
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,763
United States


« Reply #6 on: September 08, 2014, 12:01:04 PM »

Except that, in 2014, they really don't, given that the USMC has seen combat in Iraq, and given that the USMC is supposed to serve as naval infantry. Are you proposing that as an amendment or not?

Removing section 4 is my proposal.


The amendment has enough votes to pass. Senators have 24 hours to change their votes.



Quote from: Restricted
You must be logged in to read this quote.



Logged
MyRescueKittehRocks
JohanusCalvinusLibertas
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,763
United States


« Reply #7 on: September 08, 2014, 02:17:54 PM »

Aye
Logged
MyRescueKittehRocks
JohanusCalvinusLibertas
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,763
United States


« Reply #8 on: September 13, 2014, 06:12:46 PM »

Nay
Logged
MyRescueKittehRocks
JohanusCalvinusLibertas
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,763
United States


« Reply #9 on: September 21, 2014, 10:56:41 PM »

Nay,

My biggest concern is the restructuring of our armed services. It's simply not a good idea thus my vote.
Logged
MyRescueKittehRocks
JohanusCalvinusLibertas
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,763
United States


« Reply #10 on: September 30, 2014, 03:33:54 PM »

Section four is unreasonable Mr. President. Just on that alone this should be vetoed please reconsider your signiture of the act.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.026 seconds with 12 queries.