I think such a reduction could stop us implementing 6a.
I don't think 300 billion is enough to do any of these things (apart from c, maybe) let alone all of them.
I can understand the biological and chemical parts, but the nuclear part is very dangerous. I don't like that our country has them, but now that other countries do as well, short of everyone getting rid of them, we need to keep them.
This seems sensible, but I'm not sure what it means in concrete terms.
I can support this.
I mostly agree with this, but never is a very very strong word.
The end to imperialism act seems relevant here. Foreign bases which are left open must be doing something towards the defence of either us or another country.
I definitely agree with the intention here (probably more so than most other senators) but this seems very absolutist. Besides, developing nations could mean anything.