Areas in a Palestinian state
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 24, 2024, 11:17:50 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Individual Politics (Moderator: The Dowager Mod)
  Areas in a Palestinian state
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Which of these Palestinian majority areas should ideally be part of a Palestinian state?
#1
Galilee (Israel)
 
#2
Wadi Ara (Israel)
 
#3
East Jerusalem
 
#4
Judea (West Bank)
 
#5
Samaria (West Bank)
 
#6
Gaza
 
#7
Jordan
 
#8
None - there should be no Palestinian state
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 57

Calculate results by number of options selected
Author Topic: Areas in a Palestinian state  (Read 1497 times)
politicus
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,173
Denmark


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: August 21, 2014, 06:25:41 AM »

Well, which of the Palestinian majority areas do you think a Palestinian state should include?

Current "states" in brackets.
Logged
TNF
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,440


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: August 21, 2014, 09:05:54 AM »

All of Israel
Logged
ElectionsGuy
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,106
United States


Political Matrix
E: 7.10, S: -7.65

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: August 21, 2014, 09:09:49 AM »

East Jerusalem, Gaza, West Bank.
Logged
SWE
SomebodyWhoExists
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,309
United States


P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: August 21, 2014, 10:59:20 AM »

Logged
TDAS04
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,538
Bhutan


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: August 21, 2014, 11:03:41 AM »

Logged
Grumpier Than Thou
20RP12
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 38,356
United States
Political Matrix
E: -5.29, S: -7.13

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: August 21, 2014, 12:05:46 PM »

Logged
H. Ross Peron
General Mung Beans
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,407
Korea, Republic of


Political Matrix
E: -6.58, S: -1.91

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: August 21, 2014, 12:30:44 PM »

Gaza and West Bank minus some continguous settlement block areas.
Logged
Snowstalker Mk. II
Snowstalker
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,414
Palestinian Territory, Occupied


Political Matrix
E: -7.10, S: -4.35

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: August 21, 2014, 03:15:42 PM »

Logged
Vega
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,253
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: August 21, 2014, 04:06:29 PM »

Gaza and Jordan.
Logged
Vosem
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,637
United States


Political Matrix
E: 8.13, S: -6.09

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: August 21, 2014, 04:19:28 PM »

The Annapolis plan seems about right. I would remove a 'tentacle' connecting Kiryat Arba either to the Negev or to the Gush Etzion bloc (the former seems significantly less disruptive), and probably make Ariel and Karnei Shomron an exclave. The Green Triangle might also be added to Palestine, though with the qualifier that Israeli Arabs who wish to remain in Israel will be provided alternative housing and recompense by the Israeli government. I didn't vote, since I think these options are rather simplistic.
Logged
politicus
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,173
Denmark


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: August 22, 2014, 09:53:44 AM »
« Edited: August 22, 2014, 03:18:01 PM by politicus »

I didn't vote, since I think these options are rather simplistic.

I think that's unavoidable in such polls.

Thanks for giving a serious and elaborate answer. I mostly agree with you, but I tend to think a Palestinian incorporation of (most of) Jordan is unavoidable in the long run, which would be fair given population distribution.

Do you have the map of the Annapolis plan?
Logged
courts
Ghost_white
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,469
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: August 22, 2014, 10:48:07 AM »

Logged
Atlas Has Shrugged
ChairmanSanchez
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 38,096
United States


Political Matrix
E: 5.29, S: -5.04


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: August 22, 2014, 09:26:19 PM »

Logged
Redalgo
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,681
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: August 23, 2014, 12:25:46 AM »

Logged
dead0man
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,324
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: August 23, 2014, 12:31:21 AM »

Gaza and West Bank
Logged
ingemann
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,304


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: August 23, 2014, 03:19:24 AM »

Gaza and West Bank, plus some kind of compromise, which would give the Palestinians some suburbs of East Jerusalem and a joint ownership over the temple mount.
Logged
Velasco
andi
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,703
Western Sahara


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: August 23, 2014, 03:41:49 AM »

West Bank, East Jerusalem and Gaza. Jerusalem as a whole might have a special (extra territorial) status, some territory exchanges might be done across the Green Line and there must be a corridor between Gaza and the West Bank.
Logged
politicallefty
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,244
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -3.87, S: -9.22

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: August 23, 2014, 09:54:43 AM »

At the least, the West Bank, Gaza, and East Jerusalem (although as others have mentioned, a special status could be created for the entirety of Jerusalem).

Considering the available options, why wasn't the Golan Heights one of them?
Logged
Indy Texas
independentTX
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,268
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.52, S: -3.48

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: August 23, 2014, 02:30:54 PM »

West Bank + Gaza

I have indicated my preference in the past for the entire city of Jerusalem to be an independent city under UN protection.

Israeli Arabs who wish to remain in Israel will be provided alternative housing and recompense by the Israeli government.

Any plan that presumes to treat Israeli Arabs differently from Israeli Jews when it comes to the possibility of trading areas with Israeli residents for areas with Palestinians should be a non-starter. It's a fundamentally racist premise to start with to assume that Israeli Arabs should automatically be "okay" with living in a Palestinian state.

Where land tradeoffs happen and you end up with Israelis in Palestine or Palestinians in Israel, there ought to be a hard and fast rule that neither government has the right to force or encourage non-native residents to relocate to the other country.
Logged
Vosem
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,637
United States


Political Matrix
E: 8.13, S: -6.09

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: August 23, 2014, 06:07:24 PM »

I didn't vote, since I think these options are rather simplistic.

I think that's unavoidable in such polls.

Thanks for giving a serious and elaborate answer. I mostly agree with you, but I tend to think a Palestinian incorporation of (most of) Jordan is unavoidable in the long run, which would be fair given population distribution.

Do you have the map of the Annapolis plan?



That's it. I would remove a 'tail' from Mezodot Yehuda to Hebron; in the north, Ariel and the area to its north would become an Israeli exclave; and, lastly, I might add bits of the Green Triangle.

West Bank + Gaza

I have indicated my preference in the past for the entire city of Jerusalem to be an independent city under UN protection.

Israeli Arabs who wish to remain in Israel will be provided alternative housing and recompense by the Israeli government.

Any plan that presumes to treat Israeli Arabs differently from Israeli Jews when it comes to the possibility of trading areas with Israeli residents for areas with Palestinians should be a non-starter. It's a fundamentally racist premise to start with to assume that Israeli Arabs should automatically be "okay" with living in a Palestinian state.

...which is why in my own post I noted that Israeli citizens -- Jewish or Arab -- should not be compelled to live in the future Palestinian state if they do not wish it.

Where land tradeoffs happen and you end up with Israelis in Palestine or Palestinians in Israel, there ought to be a hard and fast rule that neither government has the right to force or encourage non-native residents to relocate to the other country.

Sure, but there ought to be mechanisms in place to allow Israelis stuck in Palestine or Palestinians stuck in Israel to do so if they wish. Hopefully an evacuation of settlers beforehand will keep these issues to a minimum within the West Bank itself, but if parts of pre-1967 Israel become a part of the future Palestine (which is frequently a part of these plans) these sorts of issues will arise.
Logged
Dixie Reborn
BeyondTruthAndIdeals
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 817
Canada


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: August 23, 2014, 09:22:27 PM »

Palestinians should be given amnesty and Israeli citizenship, leading to a one state solution.
Logged
swl
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 581
France


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: August 24, 2014, 12:51:49 PM »
« Edited: August 24, 2014, 12:54:15 PM by swl »

I voted Judea and Samaria, the current West Bank.

I think it's in every one interest to manage to divide the Israel-Palestine conflict in two Israel-West Bank and Israel-Gaza conflicts. Israel was not far from achieving that but they stupidly screwed it up by not making any effort in the West Bank.

The PA in the West Bank is much more reasonable and respectable than the Hamas, and it would release a big burden for Israel to be finally at peace with the West Bank. It would also offer a good image to all Palestinians and to the whole Arab world.

I also thing that the two-state solution is not really viable, because as soon as they would get it, the Hamas dominated Gaza and the PA dominated West Bank would start fighting and Gaza would quickly secede (look at the precedent of Pakistan and Bangladesh).

So I think the West Bank should get its independence and become the country "Palestine".
Gaza would get its independence later and become a city-state.  
East Jerusalem is much more difficult to return to the Palestinians because of the huge number of colons, but the main difficulty there concerns religion and not really territory, so I think that ultimately an agreement could be reached if it stays under Israeli control but with open access to the different holy sites for Palestinians.

I still prefer a one-state solution where everyone loves each other, but I don't have much hope. Wink
Logged
Del Tachi
Republican95
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,863
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.52, S: 1.46

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: August 24, 2014, 01:49:55 PM »

No Palestinian state should be established. 
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.067 seconds with 14 queries.