Women in Combat
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 19, 2024, 06:53:27 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Debate (Moderator: Torie)
  Women in Combat
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2
Poll
Question: Do you support allowing women in combat positions in the military?
#1
Yes (D)
 
#2
Yes (R)
 
#3
Yes (I/O)
 
#4
No (D)
 
#5
No (R)
 
#6
No (I/O)
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 72

Author Topic: Women in Combat  (Read 3760 times)
H. Ross Peron
General Mung Beans
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,407
Korea, Republic of


Political Matrix
E: -6.58, S: -1.91

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: August 26, 2014, 05:58:28 AM »

Yes (D)
Logged
dead0man
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,275
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: August 26, 2014, 06:27:48 AM »

95% of the time it's fine, an improvement even in the top special forces echelon (imagine how much easier it would to be all sneaky if you were a lady instead of a dude), I think that the "we don't want womens in the fox hole with us" is overblown and women already are in some combat positions.

...but physical and mental standards shouldn't be lowered to make it happen.
Logged
MurrayBannerman
murraybannerman
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 756


Political Matrix
E: 5.55, S: -2.09

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: August 26, 2014, 11:45:07 AM »

There are some logistical problems and potential restrictions, but as a general point, yes.
Logged
The Dowager Mod
texasgurl
Moderators
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,975
United States


Political Matrix
E: -9.48, S: -8.57

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: August 26, 2014, 11:53:04 AM »

I would have re enlisted if they had let me into combat.
Logged
ElectionsGuy
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,106
United States


Political Matrix
E: 7.10, S: -7.65

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: August 26, 2014, 11:56:53 AM »

Of course.
Logged
TDAS04
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,525
Bhutan


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: August 26, 2014, 12:00:48 PM »

Logged
TNF
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,440


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: August 26, 2014, 12:30:43 PM »

Yes (not a sexist)
Logged
Snowstalker Mk. II
Snowstalker
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,414
Palestinian Territory, Occupied


Political Matrix
E: -7.10, S: -4.35

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: August 26, 2014, 01:03:14 PM »

No, but I don't believe men should be allowed to take combat roles either.
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,084
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: August 26, 2014, 01:08:44 PM »

Logged
Goldwater
Republitarian
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,067
United States


Political Matrix
E: 1.55, S: -4.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: August 26, 2014, 07:27:15 PM »

Yes, and like dead0man said they should be held to the same physical standards as men.
Logged
Atlas Has Shrugged
ChairmanSanchez
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 38,096
United States


Political Matrix
E: 5.29, S: -5.04


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: August 26, 2014, 08:52:19 PM »

Anyone, man or woman, should be able to serve if they can handle it. But no special treatment should be made.
Logged
Never
Never Convinced
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,623
Political Matrix
E: 4.65, S: 3.30

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: August 27, 2014, 08:13:14 AM »

Yes, and like dead0man said they should be held to the same physical standards as men.
Logged
Mr. Morden
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,073
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: August 27, 2014, 08:22:11 AM »

...but physical and mental standards shouldn't be lowered to make it happen.

Out of curiosity, are the standards currently the same in the US military?  Do they have different physical requirements for men and women?
Logged
dead0man
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,275
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: August 27, 2014, 08:42:13 AM »

...but physical and mental standards shouldn't be lowered to make it happen.

Out of curiosity, are the standards currently the same in the US military?  Do they have different physical requirements for men and women?

When I joined (Dec94) to get in there were no physical requirements for any of the branches except, oddly, the Air Force which required everybody to lift some sorta low amount (say, 35lbs...I don't really remember).  You had to pass a "limber" test in MEPS (military in processing), but that wasn't that big of a deal.  During basic there were different requirements for men and women to graduate.  I don't remember the details, but say a male had to do the mile in 9min, women got 10:30...if males had to do 3 pullups, women only had to do 1...60 pushups in 2 min for men, 40 for women...that kind of thing.  If memory serves, Marines recently upped their requirements for women to match the men, but then most women failed.

The vast majority of people in the military don't do "combat".
Logged
Clarko95 📚💰📈
Clarko95
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,599
Sweden


Political Matrix
E: -5.61, S: -1.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: August 27, 2014, 09:01:10 AM »

Yes, and we should have them register for Selective Service as well.
Logged
angus
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,423
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: August 27, 2014, 09:10:50 AM »
« Edited: August 27, 2014, 11:01:10 AM by angus »

I know some very combative women, so yes.  


Logged
© tweed
Miamiu1027
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,562
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: August 27, 2014, 09:44:30 AM »

Yes, and we should have them register for Selective Service as well.

a funny thought just came into my head - if the trans rights movement continues to advance, will it be possible for me to register myself as a female on my drivers' license, etc. and thus avoid risk of being drafted?
Logged
Simfan34
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,744
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.90, S: 4.17

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: August 27, 2014, 10:28:30 AM »

Yes, and like dead0man said they should be held to the same physical standards as men.
Logged
True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)
Ernest
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 42,156
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: August 28, 2014, 05:05:30 PM »

Yes, and we should have them register for Selective Service as well.

a funny thought just came into my head - if the trans rights movement continues to advance, will it be possible for me to register myself as a female on my drivers' license, etc. and thus avoid risk of being drafted?

I suppose it would Tongue

tweed, you've been on here long enough that unless we get into a total war where we need to draft a couple hundred divisions of infantry, you should be old enough to avoid the draft.
Logged
Person Man
Angry_Weasel
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,689
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: August 29, 2014, 08:46:28 AM »
« Edited: August 29, 2014, 08:48:41 AM by MooMooMoo »

95% of the time it's fine, an improvement even in the top special forces echelon (imagine how much easier it would to be all sneaky if you were a lady instead of a dude), I think that the "we don't want womens in the fox hole with us" is overblown and women already are in some combat positions.

...but physical and mental standards shouldn't be lowered to make it happen.

Though I would think it would be more of a physical issue. There's more overlap than you think in terms of whose dark, obedient and though enough for the job. However, its reasonable to think that where half of all men can probably be trained up to be strong enough, only 1-5% of women can be. Its very tough for girls to pullups, but out of every 10-20 I see in the gym, there is one that can do as many as a man.
Logged
dead0man
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,275
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: August 29, 2014, 08:56:17 AM »

95% of the time it's fine, an improvement even in the top special forces echelon (imagine how much easier it would to be all sneaky if you were a lady instead of a dude), I think that the "we don't want womens in the fox hole with us" is overblown and women already are in some combat positions.

...but physical and mental standards shouldn't be lowered to make it happen.

Though I would think it would be more of a physical issue. There's more overlap than you think in terms of whose dark, obedient and though enough for the job.
I have no clue what you're trying to say here, especially the "dark" part.
Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
Agreed.
Logged
Lurker
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 765
Norway
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: August 29, 2014, 04:52:55 PM »

It should be decided on an individual basis. Any woman who is physically strong enough  for whatever role she apllies for should obviously be allowed to serve. Concerns that this will harm the morale of the troops or ideas that women are meant to fight wars are nothing but outdated BS.
Logged
ElectionsGuy
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,106
United States


Political Matrix
E: 7.10, S: -7.65

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: August 29, 2014, 11:06:45 PM »

Funnily, this is actually something that Pat Buchanan railed against in his famous 1992 RNC speech.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pICypNXHKbg

(4:10)
Logged
MATTROSE94
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,803
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -5.29, S: -6.43

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: August 30, 2014, 09:50:59 AM »

There are some logistical problems and potential restrictions, but as a general point, yes.
Logged
Person Man
Angry_Weasel
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,689
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #24 on: August 30, 2014, 11:11:35 AM »

95% of the time it's fine, an improvement even in the top special forces echelon (imagine how much easier it would to be all sneaky if you were a lady instead of a dude), I think that the "we don't want womens in the fox hole with us" is overblown and women already are in some combat positions.

...but physical and mental standards shouldn't be lowered to make it happen.

Though I would think it would be more of a physical issue. There's more overlap than you think in terms of whose dark, obedient and though enough for the job.
I have no clue what you're trying to say here, especially the "dark" part.
Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
Agreed.

I meant to say is that there will be some, but few women who can do combat...but they are around. Mental/emotional differences won't be as much as a challenge as people think. 
Logged
Pages: [1] 2  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.064 seconds with 14 queries.