IA-Suffolk: Mitt-mentum!

[Senator Cris]

Romney 35%
Huckabee 9%
Christie 6%
Santorum 6%
Bush 5%
Cruz 5%
Paul 5%
Perry 5%
Ryan 4%
Walker 4%
Jindal 2%
Rubio 2%
Huntsman 1%
Kasich 1%

Undecided 10%

Without Romney

Huckabee 13%
Christie 11%
Perry 9%
Bush 7%
Paul 7%
Santorum 6%
Ryan 6%
Cruz 5%
Rubio 5%
Walker 4%
Jindal 3%
Hunstman 1%
Kasich 1%

Undecided 17%


Clinton 66%
Warren 10%
Biden 8%
Cuomo 4%
O'Malley 2%
Other 1%

Undecided 8%

http://www.suffolk.edu/documents/SUPRC/8_27_2014_tables.pdf

[IceSpear]

#hillaryunder70
#tossup
#2008redux
#notready4hillary
#iowaproblem

[Mr. Morden]

Clinton's favorabilty/unfavorability in this poll is 48/41% for +7% among all voters and 81/8% for +73% among Democrats.

They also asked for respondents' second choice in the Dem. caucus:

Biden 29%
Warren 19%
Clinton 15%
Cuomo 11%
O'Malley 3%

and second choice in the GOP caucus in the scenario where Romney doesn't run:

Perry 10%
Bush 9%
Huckabee 9%
Cruz 8%
Paul 8%
Ryan 8%
Christie 5%
Rubio 5%
Santorum 5%
Walker 5%
Jindal 3%
Huntsman 2%
Kasich 2%

[Mister Mets]

Those are impressive numbers for Romney.

It would be interesting if the 2016 race ends up being between two guys who lost to Obama.

Last time something similar happened was 1968, a race between two guys who lost to JFK.

[Warren 4 Secretary of Everything]

The story here shouldn't be about Romney, he's not running. It should be that Perry is running at a particularly strong 3rd place (in the poll that matters, that doesn't include Mitt) ahead of frontrunners Paul & Bush.

[IceSpear]

The story here shouldn't be about Romney, he's not running. It should be that Perry is running at a particularly strong 3rd place (in the poll that matters, that doesn't include Mitt) ahead of frontrunners Paul & Bush.

Considering he's at 9%, I don't really see that as much of a story either.