Opinion of this statement (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 30, 2024, 10:54:13 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Discussion
  Religion & Philosophy (Moderator: Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.)
  Opinion of this statement (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: ?
#1
Freedom Statement
 
#2
Horrible Statement
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 37

Author Topic: Opinion of this statement  (Read 3100 times)
DC Al Fine
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,080
Canada


« on: September 01, 2014, 03:10:45 PM »

It is in everyone's best interest for people who want to be on birth control but can't afford it to be on it. In a head-scratching irony, you'd think the "pro-life" crowd would be the biggest proponents of it.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Humanae_Vitae
Logged
DC Al Fine
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,080
Canada


« Reply #1 on: September 03, 2014, 04:52:48 PM »

It's a false equivalency. A better use for this comparison would be for Viagra or something.

Compensation packages should be viewed holistically since they all ultimately boil down to the employer paying you. It doesn't really matter whether it's cash in your pocket, 401(k) matching, or a company car. What's relevant is the value of the compensation.

So depending on the value of the birth control foregone and the income of the individual, this can be anywhere from a trivial to significant inconvenience.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.021 seconds with 14 queries.