CJK
Jr. Member
Posts: 671
|
|
« on: August 30, 2014, 03:23:08 PM » |
|
|
« edited: August 30, 2014, 06:23:03 PM by Mr. Morden »
|
Disgusting, although not as awful as the Democrats who opposed the Iraq War, but will suddenly discover their inner neo-con if Hillary is nominated.
Biden, Reid, Harkin, Kerry, Edwards, Dorgan, Cantwell, and Kohl all voted for the Iraq War Resolution. Are they all neocons as well? It's not as though Hillary is the only one (either in terms of politicians or regular citizens) who flip flopped on this issue, as it used to have overwhelming support.
She's not a neo-con just because she supported the Iraq War (and still refuses to acknowledge it was a mistake). I'm talking about her entire foreign policy record. Also, I'm not sure that John Edwards is someone who want to be comparing Hillary to when you defend her As for the Senators you mentioned, obviously most of them aren't (although Biden is definitely a liberal interventionist which has some significant overlap with neo-conservatism). However, Lieberman, Schumer, Feinstein, and Bayh arguably are to varying degrees (especially the first two) and they also voted for the Iraq War. Additionally, many of the Democrats who supported it were conservaDems like Landrieu, Breaux, Nelson (NE), Miller, Lincoln, Carper, etc. I can't imagine why you left them out. Surely you weren't cherry-picking names
That is incorrect. In her book Clinton says:
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/hillary-clinton-iraq-war-vote-wrong-article-1.1819012
Fair enough, she finally acknowledged it was a mistake, but doesn't seem to have learned anything from it and remains as much neo-con today as she was then.
The myth that "neocons" caused the war lives on. Here is an interesting counterfactual on what would have happened if Gore was president. link
|