Baker pulls ahead in Massachusetts (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 02:36:05 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2014 Gubernatorial Election Polls
  Baker pulls ahead in Massachusetts (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Baker pulls ahead in Massachusetts  (Read 5031 times)
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,742


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

« on: August 28, 2014, 09:41:43 PM »

Why would Massachusetts Democrats nominate a centrist proven loser?

Why did Democrats decide to go with a proven loser?
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,742


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

« Reply #1 on: August 29, 2014, 03:44:21 PM »


Why would Massachusetts Republicans nominate a centrist proven loser?

Why did Republicans decide to go with a proven loser?
Baker lost to a popular incumbent governor. Coakley lost to a little-known state senator. Huge difference.

As a Democrat in Massachusetts. If she had lost a Senate race by 5 points in Texas, I'd say sure run her again, but Democrats in Massachusetts shouldn't lose, period.
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,742


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

« Reply #2 on: September 01, 2014, 02:13:23 AM »

Mass is one state that votes very indy in gubernatorial elections. I see this as Coakley loss. Not an effect on the Dem party in these midterms. We can still win in WI and FL while losing this seat.

True, they have more of a history of having Democrats lose in governor races  than Senate races, where only one *ahem* Democrat lost since 1972.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.028 seconds with 12 queries.