I love how all of the Clinton-hacks in this thread are just using ad-hominem rather than addressing the points made in the article. They don't want to admit that Hilary has been wrong on everything she's said when it comes to these key foreign policy decisions.
You know the anti-Hillary hacks are desperate when they resort to pimping a column written by a racist Holocaust-denier.
Thanks for proving my point about no one wanting to adress the points made in the article.
Who cares what points he made? If you want to make points about Hillary's foreign policy, perhaps you should use a column from someone other than a racist Holocaust-denier.
Buchanan is a Hitler apologist who's flirted with Holocaust denial. He has no credibility to speak on anything. I don't care what David Duke or Shirley Phelps Roper have to say about a Hillary candidacy either.
I never said Buchanan wasn't crazy on anything. He laments the "the fall of white America" and is definitely anti-Semitic. However, that doesn't mean what he said in this article is wrong. If what we see today proves Clinton was wrong on Iraq, Libya, and Syria, then why believe her now?
