Pres. Obama Planning Executive Order on Immigration
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 19, 2024, 10:31:17 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Pres. Obama Planning Executive Order on Immigration
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2
Author Topic: Pres. Obama Planning Executive Order on Immigration  (Read 5367 times)
Frodo
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 24,545
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: August 29, 2014, 08:48:57 PM »
« edited: September 07, 2014, 04:05:55 PM by Frodo »

The White House Is Spoiling for a Fight on Immigration:
Obama seems determined to push ahead, despite the fears of some Democrats.


BY JAMES OLIPHANT
August 29, 2014


Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
Logged
Grumpier Than Thou
20RP12
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 38,322
United States
Political Matrix
E: -5.29, S: -7.13

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: August 29, 2014, 08:54:13 PM »

Splendid news!
Logged
SPC
Chuck Hagel 08
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,003
Latvia


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: August 29, 2014, 09:05:39 PM »

How is issuing executive orders negating enforcement of part of the law substantively different from the line-item veto power the Supreme Court has already ruled unconstitutional?
Logged
Cory
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,708


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: August 29, 2014, 09:20:53 PM »

Logged
TDAS04
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,525
Bhutan


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: August 29, 2014, 09:28:09 PM »

Logged
Starbucks Union Thug HokeyPuck
HockeyDude
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,376
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: August 29, 2014, 09:37:31 PM »

Yay!  Thank you President Obama for protecting these poor people who just want to have some opportunity!  I can't wait to see the racists throw their usual hissy fit.  It's funny how the GOP likes to say racism is dead as they exploit it for votes.
Logged
SWE
SomebodyWhoExists
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,303
United States


P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: August 29, 2014, 10:12:34 PM »

executive overreach imo
Logged
True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)
Ernest
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 42,156
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: August 29, 2014, 10:48:25 PM »

How is issuing executive orders negating enforcement of part of the law substantively different from the line-item veto power the Supreme Court has already ruled unconstitutional?

Because the money would still get spent.
Logged
Queen Mum Inks.LWC
Inks.LWC
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 35,011
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.65, S: -2.78

P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: August 30, 2014, 01:08:05 AM »

Yay!  Thank you President Obama for protecting these poor people who just want to have some opportunity!  I can't wait to see the racists throw their usual hissy fit.  It's funny how the GOP likes to say racism is dead as they exploit it for votes.

But what if that protection comes at the cost of checks and balances?  Americans so frequently cheer unconstitutional laws and acts that they feel are "right" or "just".  The problem is that government overreaches aren't always "right" and "just", and people's opinions of what is "right" get skewed during times of crisis... look at Hamdi v. Rumsfeld.  These constitutional provisions exist for a reason, and while it may impede social changes that some feel are needed, they also provide protections for the people.
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,085
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: August 30, 2014, 02:02:19 AM »

Logged
Cory
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,708


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: August 30, 2014, 02:04:24 AM »

Yay!  Thank you President Obama for protecting these poor people who just want to have some opportunity!  I can't wait to see the racists throw their usual hissy fit.  It's funny how the GOP likes to say racism is dead as they exploit it for votes.

Yes! This might be the second best thing Obama does in his Presidency. The first being giving health insurance to millions of American who otherwise would've went uncovered.

I can't wait!
Logged
SPC
Chuck Hagel 08
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,003
Latvia


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: August 30, 2014, 09:14:03 AM »

How is issuing executive orders negating enforcement of part of the law substantively different from the line-item veto power the Supreme Court has already ruled unconstitutional?

Because the money would still get spent.

Would the money still be spent on enforcing the law created by Congress? Given that the executive order explicitly states that it would not enforce the law for a certain class of people, how can that be interpret as anything other than a "creative reinterpretation" of the law as Congress passed it?
Logged
Bacon King
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,831
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.63, S: -9.49

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: August 30, 2014, 10:01:35 AM »

You guys are thinking way too broadly, this isn't going to be an overt power play that attempts to rewrite federal statute.

Existing Federal law already authorizes the Department of Homeland Security unilateral discretion to "parole" any alien from certain immigration admissibility requirements for a humanitarian reason or other significant national interest. This can be granted to an undocumented immigrant residing within the United States without requiring them to leave the country, in which case it is colloquially termed a "parole-in-place". An undocumented immigrant granted such a parole is thereafter allowed to legally petition for a change of immigration status since they're no longer inadmissible due to being "present in the United States without admission or parole".

This is the exact statutory mechanism the Obama administration used last year to grant amnesty to the immediate family members of military servicemen/women and reservists; the cited "significant national interest" was essentially "they will fight for Murica better if their families can be Murican too"

This link is to a USCIS memo explaining the legal logic in more detail. It would be incredibly easy, and legal, to broaden this decision to adapt it to cover most/all current undocumented immigrants that are in the US long term.
Logged
True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)
Ernest
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 42,156
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: August 30, 2014, 10:02:51 AM »

How is issuing executive orders negating enforcement of part of the law substantively different from the line-item veto power the Supreme Court has already ruled unconstitutional?

Because the money would still get spent.

Would the money still be spent on enforcing the law created by Congress? Given that the executive order explicitly states that it would not enforce the law for a certain class of people, how can that be interpret as anything other than a "creative reinterpretation" of the law as Congress passed it?

If the appropriation was hyperspecific as to what the funds could only be spent on, but I sincerely doubt that it gets to the point of specifying for example that $78 million dollars shall be spent on enforcement activities against those who have overstayed tourist visas from Ireland.  It's not as if there won't still be plenty of deportations, it's just that the focus would be even more against those newly arrived and on those who did any non-immigration crimes here than is now the case.
Logged
jaichind
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,444
United States


Political Matrix
E: 9.03, S: -5.39

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: September 06, 2014, 07:50:11 PM »

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/09/07/us/politics/obama-said-to-delay-executive-action-on-immigration.html?_r=0

Looks like this will get pushed back until after the election.   Immigration activists will now be steaming mad since Obama kept their hopes up only to let them down.
Logged
Blue3
Starwatcher
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,050
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: September 06, 2014, 10:15:55 PM »

I don't understand why they're so mad if it's just delayed a few months.
Logged
Queen Mum Inks.LWC
Inks.LWC
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 35,011
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.65, S: -2.78

P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: September 06, 2014, 11:26:54 PM »

That made me lose quite a bit of respect for Obama.  If you're going to take action because you think it's the right thing to do, holding off until you're in the safe zone from political retribution is a pretty scummy way of doing it.  So what's the reason for immigration change?  He's lost any ability to effectively advocate for his position by pushing off past November.
Logged
KCDem
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,928


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: September 06, 2014, 11:28:17 PM »

That made me lose quite a bit of respect for Obama.  If you're going to take action because you think it's the right thing to do, holding off until you're in the safe zone from political retribution is a pretty scummy way of doing it.  So what's the reason for immigration change?  He's lost any ability to effectively advocate for his position by pushing off past November.

Oh give me a break. Politicians do this all the time.
Logged
Queen Mum Inks.LWC
Inks.LWC
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 35,011
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.65, S: -2.78

P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: September 06, 2014, 11:40:13 PM »

That made me lose quite a bit of respect for Obama.  If you're going to take action because you think it's the right thing to do, holding off until you're in the safe zone from political retribution is a pretty scummy way of doing it.  So what's the reason for immigration change?  He's lost any ability to effectively advocate for his position by pushing off past November.

Oh give me a break. Politicians do this all the time.

Sure, but it doesn't work with something like immigration.  Tell me: why is Obama's immigration reform necessary?
Logged
Free Bird
TheHawk
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,917
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.84, S: -5.48

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: September 06, 2014, 11:48:32 PM »

That made me lose quite a bit of respect for Obama.  If you're going to take action because you think it's the right thing to do, holding off until you're in the safe zone from political retribution is a pretty scummy way of doing it.  So what's the reason for immigration change?  He's lost any ability to effectively advocate for his position by pushing off past November.
Logged
badgate
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,466


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: September 07, 2014, 01:37:54 AM »

Tell me: why is Obama's immigration reform necessary?

Because the House failed to act.
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,085
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: September 07, 2014, 04:50:47 AM »

Yeah, this is pathetic and also quite stupid. Democrats have yet to understand that they have much more to lose by spitting on their base at any occasion than by slightly turning off a handful of "moderates" by ever doing anything bold.
Logged
Yank2133
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,387


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: September 07, 2014, 10:49:22 AM »

Lmao at the concern trolling by the usual suspects.

Obama's decision is just common sense. With Obamacare becoming irrelevant, the economy in decent shape, and the fact that Americans don't really care about foreign policy, Obama simply took the last major issue prior to the election of the plate.

Liberals will whine and bitch about it on the internet like they always do, but this isn't that big of a deal.
Logged
Free Bird
TheHawk
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,917
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.84, S: -5.48

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: September 07, 2014, 12:33:25 PM »

Obama needs to stop using executive orders left and right, and I have no respect for you if you think he can just continuously disregard congress like this
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #24 on: September 07, 2014, 12:38:25 PM »

Lmao at the concern trolling by the usual suspects.

Obama's decision is just common sense. With Obamacare becoming irrelevant, the economy in decent shape, and the fact that Americans don't really care about foreign policy, Obama simply took the last major issue prior to the election of the plate.

Liberals will whine and bitch about it on the internet like they always do, but this isn't that big of a deal.

Truth. It's only 58 days until the election. People act like he's postponing it indefinitely or backed off doing it at all.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.066 seconds with 12 queries.