1960: Johnson vs. Goldwater
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 19, 2024, 12:14:09 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Election What-ifs?
  Past Election What-ifs (US) (Moderator: Dereich)
  1960: Johnson vs. Goldwater
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: 1960: Johnson vs. Goldwater  (Read 2549 times)
President Johnson
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,817
Germany


Political Matrix
E: -3.23, S: -4.70


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: September 01, 2014, 08:44:12 AM »

Barry Goldwater defeats Richard Nixon for the Republican nomination in 1960. To balance his ticket ideological und geographical he picks Nelson Rockefeller as his Running Mate.

Meanwhile, Lyndon Johnson is the Democratic nominee. He selects John F. Kennedy as his vice-presidential candidate.

What happens on November 8, 1960? Discuss the scenario with maps.
Logged
🐒Gods of Prosperity🔱🐲💸
shua
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 25,680
Nepal


Political Matrix
E: 1.29, S: -0.70

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: September 11, 2014, 12:19:14 AM »

It would have been very difficult for Goldwater to win the nomination in 1960, the conservative movement not being nearly as strong politically as it would be 4 years later, and Nixon himself not being from the liberal wing.   But say he does, I don't think Rockefeller is willing to play second fiddle to someone he disagrees with so strongly when he can instead set his own agenda as leader of his faction and a powerful Governor.  If Goldwater needs a Northeast moderate, Prescott Bush is more likely.

Logged
🐒Gods of Prosperity🔱🐲💸
shua
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 25,680
Nepal


Political Matrix
E: 1.29, S: -0.70

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: September 11, 2014, 01:20:28 PM »

While the Johnson-Kennedy ticket is perceived as hailing from the more conservative wing of the party, Goldwater provides a strong contrast when it comes to the New Deal legacy.  The contrast when it comes to civil rights is less clear: the record of Goldwater and Bush are more pro-Civil Rights than their Democratic counterparts, but Johnson has expressed a broader willingness for federal action than has Goldwater. To provide a more liberal alternative, Senator Wayne Morse runs on an independent ticket with Leo Isacson, formerly an American Labor Party Congressman from the the Bronx.



Senator Lyndon B. Johnson (D-TX)/ Senator John F. Kennedy (D-MA)  448 51.9%
Senator Barry Goldwater (R-AZ)/ Senator Prescott Bush (R-CT)  89  42.2%
Senator Wayne Morse (I-OR)/ Fmr. Rep. Leo Isacson (I-NY)  5.5%
Unpledged Electors .2%
Logged
Mr. Smith
MormDem
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 33,173
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: September 12, 2014, 06:40:36 PM »

I have a feeling Johnson probably would've gone with Hubert Humphrey anyway as Kennedy does not quite have the experience Humphrey has,Humphrey would do more to appear pro-Civil Rights than Kennedy.

The map and other candidates would probably look the same as shua's,maybe switch Florida and the Dakotas with Louisiana and Connecticut
Logged
MATTROSE94
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,803
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -5.29, S: -6.43

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: October 08, 2014, 06:38:51 PM »

While the Johnson-Kennedy ticket is perceived as hailing from the more conservative wing of the party, Goldwater provides a strong contrast when it comes to the New Deal legacy.  The contrast when it comes to civil rights is less clear: the record of Goldwater and Bush are more pro-Civil Rights than their Democratic counterparts, but Johnson has expressed a broader willingness for federal action than has Goldwater. To provide a more liberal alternative, Senator Wayne Morse runs on an independent ticket with Leo Isacson, formerly an American Labor Party Congressman from the the Bronx.



Senator Lyndon B. Johnson (D-TX)/ Senator John F. Kennedy (D-MA)  448 51.9%
Senator Barry Goldwater (R-AZ)/ Senator Prescott Bush (R-CT)  89  42.2%
Senator Wayne Morse (I-OR)/ Fmr. Rep. Leo Isacson (I-NY)  5.5%
Unpledged Electors .2%
That seems about right, though I feel that Barry Goldwater would have an edge in Virginia and Tennessee. In addition, Lyndon Johnson possibly would have ended up carry Vermont, as Goldwater's more extreme conservatism would not have played too well there (then again, his choice of Prescott Bush as his running-mate might have quelled fears about his conservatism).
Logged
dougie77
Newbie
*
Posts: 7
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: November 28, 2014, 10:51:09 PM »

why does South Carolina vote Republican though?Do you remember that GOP was seen as Party of Lincoln and physically impossible for GOP to win SC until 1964?
Logged
🐒Gods of Prosperity🔱🐲💸
shua
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 25,680
Nepal


Political Matrix
E: 1.29, S: -0.70

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: November 29, 2014, 03:30:56 PM »

why does South Carolina vote Republican though?Do you remember that GOP was seen as Party of Lincoln and physically impossible for GOP to win SC until 1964?

Ike in 52 and Nixon in 60 both got about 49% of the vote. It's very possible to see a GOP win here, though perhaps on second thought LBJ might be more likely to take it even against a Republican that is a relatively good fit for the state.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.029 seconds with 14 queries.