LA judge upholds state SSM ban

[Queen Mum Inks.LWC]

God, at first I thought LA meant Los Angeles and I was very confused for several reasons. Still, this is going to SCOTUS, and it's a shame.

I'd say it's still at least a year away (if that).  They won't take it until there's a Circuit split.

[Queen Mum Inks.LWC]

In cases like Bush v. Gore . . . the five conservative justices have proven that they will pay the Constitution no more mind than toilet paper when it conflicts with their personal political agendas.

Now that's just ridiculous.  Bush v. Gore has been a talking point of liberals to bash conservatives on the Court for years, but most people who bash the conservatives couldn't even say why Bush v. Gore was decided wrongly.  So let's hear it... what about Bush v. Gore do you disagree with the conservatives on, and what would you have held?