KS-Sen: Taylor drops out (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2024, 01:04:24 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  KS-Sen: Taylor drops out (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: KS-Sen: Taylor drops out  (Read 24789 times)
Brittain33
brittain33
Moderator
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,971


« on: September 09, 2014, 12:30:27 PM »

Inks, in this case "Any person who has been nominated by any means for any national, state, county or township office who declares that they are incapable of fulfilling the duties of office if elected" plays the same role as "A well regulated militia, composed of the body of the people, being the best security of a free State" in the second amendment. What's your take on that clause?
Logged
Brittain33
brittain33
Moderator
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,971


« Reply #1 on: September 11, 2014, 09:09:59 AM »

Gee, so if King and Sanders want to continue caucusing with the Dems, Orman will just have to go along with that, it sounds like.
Logged
Brittain33
brittain33
Moderator
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,971


« Reply #2 on: September 16, 2014, 12:34:31 PM »

Kris Kobach spits in the face of democracy once again. Nothing to see here, move on.

The law is pretty clear: "Any person who has been nominated by any means for any national, state, county or township office who declares that they are incapable of fulfilling the duties of office if elected may cause such person’s name to be withdrawn from nomination by a request in writing, signed by the person and acknowledged before an officer qualified to take acknowledgments of deeds."

If he didn't declare that he was incapable of fulfilling the duties of the office, he can't withdraw.  Blame the legislature for crafting the law, not the person enforcing it.

Even if the SOS's office helped Taylor craft the letter, is there any evidence that Bryant was aware of the provision?  If he wasn't, then that's arguably grounds he should be fired for doing a poor job, but it's ultimately Taylor's responsibility to ensure that his campaign follows the law.

Inks, you put up a good fight for Kobach here, but his lawyer had to admit today to the court that the SOS approved withdrawal from the ballot in the past for several candidates who did the same thing Taylor did. Kobach decided to change the standard of compliance when the removal had the potential to affect his party in a detrimental way.

Logged
Brittain33
brittain33
Moderator
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,971


« Reply #3 on: September 16, 2014, 01:54:06 PM »

Republican losing a senate race in Kansas vs. an incumbent recovering from numbers like this with Taylor's support waiting in the wings for Orman.

Which is harder to believe?
Logged
Brittain33
brittain33
Moderator
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,971


« Reply #4 on: September 19, 2014, 08:25:51 AM »

Phil, please reread the thread. Kobach's office ok'd several previous primary winners to withdraw from the ballot using the same procedure Taylor followed. The letter of the law is broad enough that what he did was legal then, and set a binding precedent. Especially, you know, after his office told Taylor this would be sufficient to have him withdraw.

I don't understand what principle you"re defending here. There must be ways to cheer for your team without going all AggregateDemand about it.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.026 seconds with 12 queries.