Myths of 1992 (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 30, 2024, 04:50:19 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Individual Politics (Moderator: The Dowager Mod)
  Myths of 1992 (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Is A a myth? / Is B a myth?
#1
Yes / Yes
 
#2
Yes / No
 
#3
No / Yes
 
#4
No / No
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 50

Author Topic: Myths of 1992  (Read 759 times)
Fmr President & Senator Polnut
polnut
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,489
Australia


Political Matrix
E: -2.71, S: -5.22

« on: September 16, 2014, 01:16:42 AM »

1. Perot hurt both, but probably did swing a few states to Clinton, but I can't think of one where he swung it to Bush. I say Perot probably had an impact in MT, CO, NH and maybe NV...hmmm, GA?... perhaps Perot stopped Clinton in AZ?

2. I don't think electorally, they would have been ANY-WHERE near as successful, especially in the South with a Tsongas or Brown, actually I'm sure of it. I do think Bush was kind of doomed, but Clinton was much better placed to capitalise on tat weakness.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.028 seconds with 14 queries.