Myths of 1992 (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 01, 2024, 06:29:23 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Individual Politics (Moderator: The Dowager Mod)
  Myths of 1992 (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Is A a myth? / Is B a myth?
#1
Yes / Yes
 
#2
Yes / No
 
#3
No / Yes
 
#4
No / No
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 50

Author Topic: Myths of 1992  (Read 777 times)
Oldiesfreak1854
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,674
United States


WWW
« on: September 16, 2014, 08:40:18 PM »

They're both myths.  Clinton won largely because he won over the moderates (and they've been voting for Democrats ever since.)  A is a myth because exit polls showed Perot taking votes about equally from Bush and Clinton.  B is a myth because Bush's job approval was low enough that just about any decent Democrat could have beaten him.

Lee Atwater, who had helped run Bush's very negative 1988 campaign, was dead.
This is another myth.  Bush's 1988 campaign was no more negative than the Dukakis campaign, and Bush's attacks were far from the only reason he won.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.022 seconds with 14 queries.