PA: The Second amendment act.
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 24, 2024, 11:53:55 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Government
  Regional Governments (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  PA: The Second amendment act.
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]
Author Topic: PA: The Second amendment act.  (Read 2308 times)
Fed. Pac. Chairman Devin
Devin
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 646
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #25 on: September 20, 2014, 12:21:02 AM »

Are there any objections to the amendment?
Logged
Cranberry
TheCranberry
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,501
Austria


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #26 on: September 20, 2014, 05:45:18 AM »

Sorry for the short answer yesterday, here are my two cents:

I feel that our constitution is a sacral, the main part of our democracy; the very thing that defines the People's Region, that makes us the People's Region. The People's Region is that way because we define the People's Region, through our constitution. So in short, in some way, we define us through our constitution.
On the other hand, for me this bill has no place in the constitution. We in no way define us through not allowing incestous or polygamous marriages. This is not a question of whether we should allow this or not; but rather of if we should define us partly through not allowing those kinds of marriages. I don't think they should be allowed, yes, but I far more strongly think that we should keep our constitution untouched of this, as I don't want us to define ourselves through that.
Logged
Fed. Pac. Chairman Devin
Devin
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 646
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #27 on: September 21, 2014, 07:29:33 PM »

Motion to table.
Logged
Simfan34
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,744
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.90, S: 4.17

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #28 on: September 22, 2014, 12:26:23 AM »

So we should we consider this as a law instrad?
Logged
Cranberry
TheCranberry
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,501
Austria


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #29 on: September 22, 2014, 09:51:42 AM »

If you want, pass it as a law. At best, I would not see this topic dealt with, we don't allow it to start with, but pass it as a law if you feel to do so. I won't oppose it as a law; I will continue to oppose it as a Pacific citizen as a constitutional amendment.
Logged
Never
Never Convinced
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,623
Political Matrix
E: 4.65, S: 3.30

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #30 on: September 22, 2014, 09:58:32 PM »

I think this should be considered as law, so long as both incest and polygamy are being banned.
Logged
Fed. Pac. Chairman Devin
Devin
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 646
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #31 on: September 22, 2014, 10:51:04 PM »

Alright a vote on the amendment is open. AYE
Logged
Simfan34
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,744
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.90, S: 4.17

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #32 on: September 22, 2014, 11:05:10 PM »

The amendment proposed by Never?
Logged
Fed. Pac. Chairman Devin
Devin
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 646
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #33 on: September 23, 2014, 10:15:42 PM »

Yes.
Logged
Sec. of State Superique
Superique
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,305
Brazil


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #34 on: September 28, 2014, 04:44:37 PM »

What are we exactly discussing? :/
Logged
Sec. of State Superique
Superique
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,305
Brazil


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #35 on: September 28, 2014, 04:52:46 PM »

Ok, know I understand this. Don't the honorable gentlemen believe that this shouldn't be part of our Constitution?
Logged
I Will Not Be Wrong
outofbox6
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,351
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #36 on: September 29, 2014, 06:12:33 AM »

Ok, know I understand this. Don't the honorable gentlemen believe that this shouldn't be part of our Constitution?
Agreed.
Logged
Fed. Pac. Chairman Devin
Devin
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 646
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #37 on: September 29, 2014, 09:15:02 PM »

Ok, know I understand this. Don't the honorable gentlemen believe that this shouldn't be part of our Constitution?
Yes, we are voting on the amemdment, to the amendment. It's confusing.
Logged
Simfan34
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,744
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.90, S: 4.17

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #38 on: September 29, 2014, 09:21:06 PM »

You are too late, I'm afraid, it has been a week, as per the Rules of Order the speakership has fallen vacant.
Logged
Simfan34
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,744
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.90, S: 4.17

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #39 on: September 30, 2014, 08:13:47 PM »

Standard debate time has now ended.

I would like to see an amendment made that turns the provisions of this legislation into statute as opposed to a constitutional amendment, for the reasons indicated by members of the Legislative Council and our honourable Senator.

In this vein, I move to extend debate until otherwise motioned. If no objections to this motion are made within 12 hours, it will be considered carried.
Logged
Sec. of State Superique
Superique
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,305
Brazil


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #40 on: October 07, 2014, 09:10:12 PM »

Standard debate time has now ended.

I would like to see an amendment made that turns the provisions of this legislation into statute as opposed to a constitutional amendment, for the reasons indicated by members of the Legislative Council and our honourable Senator.

In this vein, I move to extend debate until otherwise motioned. If no objections to this motion are made within 12 hours, it will be considered carried.

It seems that this is the case. I believe also that I'm failing with my responsibilities. I'm considering to resign and leave this office for someone better than me :/
Logged
Simfan34
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,744
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.90, S: 4.17

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #41 on: October 08, 2014, 12:34:08 PM »

Standard debate time has now ended.

I would like to see an amendment made that turns the provisions of this legislation into statute as opposed to a constitutional amendment, for the reasons indicated by members of the Legislative Council and our honourable Senator.

In this vein, I move to extend debate until otherwise motioned. If no objections to this motion are made within 12 hours, it will be considered carried.

It seems that this is the case. I believe also that I'm failing with my responsibilities. I'm considering to resign and leave this office for someone better than me :/

Please don't delay if you think this best.
Logged
Fed. Pac. Chairman Devin
Devin
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 646
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #42 on: October 09, 2014, 07:37:09 PM »

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
Sponsor:Never.
Does this Amendment work Governor?
Logged
Simfan34
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,744
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.90, S: 4.17

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #43 on: October 10, 2014, 09:07:52 PM »

It need some more editing, but it is on the floor.

Logged
Pages: 1 [2]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.047 seconds with 13 queries.