CO-Quinnipiac: Gardner +8 (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 30, 2024, 05:47:40 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2014 Gubernatorial Election Polls
  2014 Senatorial Election Polls
  CO-Quinnipiac: Gardner +8 (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: CO-Quinnipiac: Gardner +8  (Read 4081 times)
Torie
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,054
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -3.48, S: -4.70

« on: September 18, 2014, 10:25:23 AM »
« edited: September 18, 2014, 03:38:20 PM by Torie »

Senator Udall may soon have more to worry about than whether or not this poll is an outlier gone bad, or something suggesting that the the seams are coming apart in his hull -  to wit, that he appears at least facially to have been less than candid, and perhaps totally disingenuous, or just an ineffectual vacillator, on the matter of health care delivery systems in the US - from advocating  just making the private insurance system better, then a 180 degree tack to embracing the public option, and finally landing at the conclusion of his personal little Space Odyssey, upon the little bit of this, a little bit of that, now riddled with executive order waivers and delays, designed to be motored by the toothless now verging on eviscerated mandate penalty, Rube Goldberg toy commonly known as Obamacare.


Expert to hear a lot more about this one from the Gardner campaign. It just drains away Udall's gravitas, and makes him seem just like an opportunistic hack. I suspect he's done myself. We shall see. Indeed, with each week, it seems overall that the prospects for the Dems overall are deteriorating.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.029 seconds with 14 queries.