Preliminary 2016 Senate Race Rankings - No Tossups (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 08:55:55 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  Preliminary 2016 Senate Race Rankings - No Tossups (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Preliminary 2016 Senate Race Rankings - No Tossups  (Read 6513 times)
Del Tachi
Republican95
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,864
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.52, S: 1.46

P P P

« on: September 28, 2014, 10:37:56 PM »

Here's how I see the 2016 Senate map shaping-up; without "tossup" ratings


So, right now it looks like D+4.  Feel free to ask for a more detailed analyses on any of the races, or make your own maps!
Logged
Del Tachi
Republican95
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,864
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.52, S: 1.46

P P P

« Reply #1 on: September 28, 2014, 10:47:20 PM »

Why such confidence in Johnson's defeat; and is that based on the assumption that Hassan challenges Ayotte?

Johnson's definitely the most endangered Republican Senate incumbent, and Wisconsin has a strong Democratic bent in presidential years.  Its the Democrats top pickup opportunity, so I'm sure that whatever top-tier candidate the Democrats recruit to run in Wisconsin (my bet is on Ron Kind) will have no problem tying Johnson to the Tea Party agendas of Cruz and Lee.

Ayotte would be vulnerable against Hassan or either-one of New Hampshire's current House members.  Ayotte could have done very well in a Susan Collins-type mold, but she instead decided to go more conservative than she can probably get away-with in New Hampshire with a presidential race driving turnout.  
Logged
Del Tachi
Republican95
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,864
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.52, S: 1.46

P P P

« Reply #2 on: September 28, 2014, 10:52:47 PM »



D+5 with Murkowski running as an Independent in Alaska.

Roy Blunt (R-MO) is very vulnerable.  Do you have him running for reelection in this scenario?  Or does the Missouri GOP get a better candidate?
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.023 seconds with 12 queries.