Confirmation Hearing: Hifly15 for SoEA (Rejected) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2024, 08:35:58 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Government (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  Confirmation Hearing: Hifly15 for SoEA (Rejected) (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Confirmation Hearing: Hifly15 for SoEA (Rejected)  (Read 2211 times)
Cranberry
TheCranberry
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,501
Austria


« on: October 01, 2014, 10:57:24 AM »

I doubt I will be able to support such a controversial character as Mr Hifly, I am sorry to say so.
Logged
Cranberry
TheCranberry
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,501
Austria


« Reply #1 on: October 03, 2014, 01:15:58 PM »

Why is there still talk of a solution for Israel/Palestine? Didn't Superique present a peace deal?
Logged
Cranberry
TheCranberry
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,501
Austria


« Reply #2 on: October 03, 2014, 01:22:02 PM »

Why is there still talk of a solution for Israel/Palestine? Didn't Superique present a peace deal?

Yes, during my presidency, Superique and I reached an agreement for a 2 state solution for both sides. There is no need to go back and try for a one state solution again, because dynamics exist in that area that make a secular, one state solution nearly impossible, unless we are trying to start another war in that area.

That's what I though throughout that whole debate. Why would people start to discuss over again things that were dealt with no longer than half a year ago? This is not necessary in my opinion.
Logged
Cranberry
TheCranberry
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,501
Austria


« Reply #3 on: October 03, 2014, 01:30:13 PM »

Why is there still talk of a solution for Israel/Palestine? Didn't Superique present a peace deal?

Yes, during my presidency, Superique and I reached an agreement for a 2 state solution for both sides. There is no need to go back and try for a one state solution again, because dynamics exist in that area that make a secular, one state solution nearly impossible, unless we are trying to start another war in that area.

That's what I though throughout that whole debate. Why would people start to discuss over again things that were dealt with no longer than half a year ago? This is not necessary in my opinion.

I guess no one paid attention to our peace deal.. Tongue

Haha seems so Tongue
But, you-know-who certainly did, I somehow remember him, as usual when someone does he does not agree with (translation - always), bitching around "that's Isreal's rightful land; muh y 3v3wun ha13 1sra3l 1!1!!!!"
Logged
Cranberry
TheCranberry
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,501
Austria


« Reply #4 on: October 04, 2014, 05:11:11 AM »

NAY
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.019 seconds with 12 queries.