I don't hate Ohio. I think Kerry's strategy in the state was brain dead, but that's hardly Ohio's fault.
Kerry was a lark. Kerry is an excellent US senator with a fine voting record. I think he can have that office as long as he wants it, but he is not an executive officer. He's just not made that way. He is nuanced and understands Law very well. He is a legislator, and we should not apply the Peter Principle. I'm not saying the democrats could have won with anyone, in light of the September 11, 2001 attacks which tend to help Republicans, but they certainly should have found a feisty attack dog, not the elder-statesman type that would have trouble winning even in peacetime. I suspect Hillary and Company understand all that and in light of this it comes as no surprise that the Dems get behind Kerry understanding that this spells a loss in order to set up a free slate in both parties in 2008 which will, if things go well for the democrats, make them the party of the First Female President.
Surely you were not surprised that Kerry lost. (or that you lost your five quid on that silly Kerry wins Mississippi bet).