1836 Presidential Election
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 26, 2024, 02:42:02 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Individual Politics (Moderator: The Dowager Mod)
  1836 Presidential Election
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Who would you have voted for?
#1
Martin Van Buren (Democratic)
 
#2
William Harrison (Whig)
 
#3
Hugh White (Whig)
 
#4
Other
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 37

Author Topic: 1836 Presidential Election  (Read 800 times)
ElectionsGuy
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,106
United States


Political Matrix
E: 7.10, S: -7.65

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: October 08, 2014, 02:29:15 PM »

1789: 62.1% Anti-Federalist; George Washington
1796: 63.0% Thomas Jefferson
1800: 75.0% Thomas Jefferson
1804: 85.7% Thomas Jefferson
1808: 76.9% James Madison
1812: 50.0% James Madison
1816: 69.2% James Monroe
1820: 60.0% James Monroe
1828: 48.0% John Q. Adams
1832: 51.5% Henry Clay
1840: 42.9% Martin Van Buren
1844: 50.0% James Birney
1848: 83.3% Martin Van Buren
1852: 69.2% John Hale
1856: 74.2% John Fremont
1860: 71.7% Abraham Lincoln
1864: 71.4% Abraham Lincoln
1868: 77.1% Ulysses Grant
1872: 65.4% Ulysses Grant
1880: 44.8% James Garfield
1888: 51.6% Grover Cleveland
1896: 32.5% John Palmer
1904: 51.4% Theodore Roosevelt
1908: 47.4% William Taft
1912: 37.5% William Taft
1920: 41.5% Warren Harding
1924: 52.4% Robert La Follette
1928: 40.0% Al Smith
1936: 45.5% Franklin Roosevelt
1944: 56.8% Franklin Roosevelt
1948: 35.7% Harry Truman
1952: 63.9% Dwight Eisenhower
1956: 67.5% Dwight Eisenhower
1960: 58.8% John Kennedy
1964: 49.2% Lyndon Johnson
1968: 44.4% Hubert Humphrey
1972: 60.5% George McGovern
1976: 50.0% Gerald Ford
1980: 26.2% Ronald Reagan
1992: 33.9% William Clinton
2000: 48.3% Al Gore
2008: 53.8% Barack Obama


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_presidential_election,_1836

Van Buren
Logged
SWE
SomebodyWhoExists
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,314
United States


P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: October 08, 2014, 02:33:17 PM »

Van Buren
Logged
Maistre
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 407
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: October 08, 2014, 02:33:23 PM »

Van Buren.
Logged
🦀🎂🦀🎂
CrabCake
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,267
Kiribati


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: October 08, 2014, 02:39:41 PM »
« Edited: October 08, 2014, 02:58:35 PM by CrabCake »

My mind is in two places in this election. I like Van Buren, but coming after Andrew Jackson's reign of tyranny (that MVB must have played some part in himself) I don't think I would be all too happy about electing one of his cronies.

I'd vote for Harrison, and hope that if he was elected he'd wear a frickin coat in his inauguration this time around.
Logged
H. Ross Peron
General Mung Beans
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,407
Korea, Republic of


Political Matrix
E: -6.58, S: -1.91

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: October 08, 2014, 08:20:33 PM »

Whoever the Whig candidate would have been in my state.
Logged
ElectionsGuy
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,106
United States


Political Matrix
E: 7.10, S: -7.65

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: October 09, 2014, 06:05:44 AM »

Whoever the Whig candidate would have been in my state.

That would actually be Daniel Webster, who for some reason I forgot to list. Oh well, just choose 'Other'. He was only on the ballot in Massachusetts and it was the only state he won.
Logged
Mechaman
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,791
Jamaica
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: October 09, 2014, 06:38:18 AM »

My mind is in two places in this election. I like Van Buren, but coming after Andrew Jackson's reign of tyranny (that MVB must have played some part in himself) I don't think I would be all too happy about electing one of his cronies.

I'd vote for Harrison, and hope that if he was elected he'd wear a frickin coat in his inauguration this time around.

I'm sorry, but all of the really horrible things that Jackson did I could easily see guys like Clay and William Harrison doing if they were elected in 1828.  I mean, unless you are one of those massively uninformed people who think that the National Republican and Whig outrage to things like the Indian Removal was because they were genuinely anti-racist and not because they were massive conservative opportunists, there really is not that many reasons besides tariffs and internal improvements to vote Whig.  Hell, if Clay were president he probably would've just killed the whole lot rather than dealing with the fallout that would come from moving them to Oklahoma.
Logged
Maistre
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 407
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: October 09, 2014, 07:17:23 AM »

Hell, if Clay were president he probably would've just killed the whole lot rather than dealing with the fallout that would come from moving them to Oklahoma.

He probably wouldn't have sent the army in to kill them or something, but he also likely wouldn't have lifted a finger when the Georgians started moving on them.
Logged
🐒Gods of Prosperity🔱🐲💸
shua
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 25,691
Nepal


Political Matrix
E: 1.29, S: -0.70

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: October 09, 2014, 07:21:19 AM »

My mind is in two places in this election. I like Van Buren, but coming after Andrew Jackson's reign of tyranny (that MVB must have played some part in himself) I don't think I would be all too happy about electing one of his cronies.

I'd vote for Harrison, and hope that if he was elected he'd wear a frickin coat in his inauguration this time around.

I'm sorry, but all of the really horrible things that Jackson did I could easily see guys like Clay and William Harrison doing if they were elected in 1828.  I mean, unless you are one of those massively uninformed people who think that the National Republican and Whig outrage to things like the Indian Removal was because they were genuinely anti-racist and not because they were massive conservative opportunists, there really is not that many reasons besides tariffs and internal improvements to vote Whig.  Hell, if Clay were president he probably would've just killed the whole lot rather than dealing with the fallout that would come from moving them to Oklahoma.

Clay didn't represent the interests of the backwoods Southern settlers infringing on Cherokee territory like Jackson did.  Is there anything in Clay's record that he would have flat out ignored a Supreme Court order on an Indian treaty like Jackson did?   (Though if you are concerned about the rights of Indians in any way W.H. Harrison is probably not your man)
Logged
politicus
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,173
Denmark


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: October 09, 2014, 07:30:14 AM »

White pressed hard to get the Indian Removal Act through and Harrison was a hardliner on the issue, so Van Buren may actually be the best of a bad lot regarding Indian affairs.
Logged
🦀🎂🦀🎂
CrabCake
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,267
Kiribati


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: October 09, 2014, 09:14:54 AM »

Yeah, I selected Harrison without thinking of his pre-Presidency actions. I still dislike the previous Democratic administration (even for things beside the Indian genocide) enough to vote for Harrison. I'm no fan of Clay, of course though.
Logged
Mechaman
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,791
Jamaica
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: October 09, 2014, 11:51:27 AM »

Hell, if Clay were president he probably would've just killed the whole lot rather than dealing with the fallout that would come from moving them to Oklahoma.

He probably wouldn't have sent the army in to kill them or something, but he also likely wouldn't have lifted a finger when the Georgians started moving on them.

Maybe, but this is pretty damning:

Quote from: Restricted
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Granted this is a Mises Institute source, but still.
Logged
🐒Gods of Prosperity🔱🐲💸
shua
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 25,691
Nepal


Political Matrix
E: 1.29, S: -0.70

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: October 09, 2014, 12:29:07 PM »

The belief that the Indians would inevitably die out in a few generations was a widely held view in the 19th century - basically what would later be called a Social Darwinist view i.e. that they would just not be able to compete with white civilization.  Clay's position was horribly racist but not the same as advocacy of genocide.
Logged
🦀🎂🦀🎂
CrabCake
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,267
Kiribati


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: October 09, 2014, 12:33:27 PM »

Yes, Jackson's anti Indian policies weren't particularly out of the norm, but I think his desperate attempts to override the courts etc. showed he was going out of his way to inflict genocide.
Logged
Wake Me Up When The Hard Border Ends
Anton Kreitzer
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,167
Australia


Political Matrix
E: 8.00, S: 3.11

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: October 09, 2014, 06:20:52 PM »

Logged
TDAS04
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,543
Bhutan


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: October 09, 2014, 09:03:11 PM »

Logged
Goldwater
Republitarian
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,067
United States


Political Matrix
E: 1.55, S: -4.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: October 09, 2014, 09:19:39 PM »

Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.038 seconds with 14 queries.