High Point University/SurveyUSA: Tie in NC, Gardner+4 in CO, Shaheen+2 in NH (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 02:38:44 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2014 Gubernatorial Election Polls
  2014 Senatorial Election Polls
  High Point University/SurveyUSA: Tie in NC, Gardner+4 in CO, Shaheen+2 in NH (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: High Point University/SurveyUSA: Tie in NC, Gardner+4 in CO, Shaheen+2 in NH  (Read 4163 times)
krazen1211
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,372


« on: October 13, 2014, 11:44:40 AM »

Great polls! All aboard train Tillis!
Logged
krazen1211
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,372


« Reply #1 on: October 13, 2014, 11:55:54 AM »

Udall needs a game changer and quick. Things keep getting better and better for Gardner and worse for Udall.

SUSA only showing Shaheen up by 2 is shocking to me, but I still suspect that Shaheen pulls out of this just fine. If Scott Brown actually managed to win in New Hampshire, I think I should be struck by lightening.

It was recently discovered that Udall has a history of littering.
Logged
krazen1211
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,372


« Reply #2 on: October 13, 2014, 12:07:07 PM »

A note to krazen and his little family here, the Colorado poll only has a 6% sample of Hispanics, which is below the actually number that will vote. That makes a big difference.

Gardner will do much better with whites than a mere +6. That makes a big difference.
Logged
krazen1211
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,372


« Reply #3 on: October 13, 2014, 12:10:10 PM »

A note to krazen and his little family here, the Colorado poll only has a 6% sample of Hispanics, which is below the actually number that will vote. That makes a big difference.

Gardner will do much better with whites than a mere +6. That makes a big difference.

He's not going to win 90% of whites. You have to realize that whites in Colorado don't vote the same as they do in the south.

Holy mathematical strawman!
Logged
krazen1211
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,372


« Reply #4 on: October 13, 2014, 12:19:11 PM »

Given CO demographics, a figure of around 79% white is probably realistic here. I don't see why that should even be disputed.


Ah, if you are referring to polls like this Quinnipiac poll that are 80% white, well, have at it.
Logged
krazen1211
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,372


« Reply #5 on: October 13, 2014, 12:29:50 PM »

Given CO demographics, a figure of around 79% white is probably realistic here. I don't see why that should even be disputed.


Ah, if you are referring to polls like this Quinnipiac poll that are 80% white, well, have at it.

Dems have a history of outperforming polls in this state. Wouldn't shock me one bit if Gardner leads everything by a few points like Buck did and then loses on election night. But you can take it to the bank that the electorate will not be 84% white.

Of course, to say that, you'd simply have to ignore situations where it wasn't true, such as Udall's first victory in 2008. The final RCP polling average was Udall +12 and he won by 10.
Logged
krazen1211
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,372


« Reply #6 on: October 13, 2014, 12:30:20 PM »

Bennett only lost whites by 3% in 2010. I don't know why Gardner would do "much better" than a 6% margin.

CNN exit polls actually had Buck up 7

Of course, there are 2 reasons. Mr. Udall and Barry's standing with Colorado whites has deteriorated since that time, and the legislature of Colorado went on a rampage.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.032 seconds with 15 queries.