Opinion of Jeff Madricks Seven Bad Ideas
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 23, 2024, 05:19:36 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Individual Politics (Moderator: The Dowager Mod)
  Opinion of Jeff Madricks Seven Bad Ideas
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Opinion of Jeff Madricks Seven Bad Ideas  (Read 200 times)
politicus
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,173
Denmark


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: October 17, 2014, 10:44:48 AM »
« edited: October 17, 2014, 11:08:23 AM by politicus »

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/09/28/books/review/seven-bad-ideas-by-jeff-madrick.html?_r=0

"In other words, economists arguing for free markets and limited government try to have it both ways: They claim that their doctrine is a deep insight derived from first principles, but dismiss as irrelevant the overwhelming evidence that these assumed principles don’t hold in practice."
Logged
AggregateDemand
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,873
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: October 17, 2014, 01:08:18 PM »
« Edited: October 17, 2014, 01:14:57 PM by AggregateDemand »

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/09/28/books/review/seven-bad-ideas-by-jeff-madrick.html?_r=0

"In other words, economists arguing for free markets and limited government try to have it both ways: They claim that their doctrine is a deep insight derived from first principles, but dismiss as irrelevant the overwhelming evidence that these assumed principles don’t hold in practice."

Written by someone who pretends to know nothing about economics to sell books to people who know nothing about economics. Economists don't make dire predictions about going over a cliff because of contagion effect. He knows how it works. The Fed raised rates sharply, starting in 2004 to tighten credit. In 2007, they cut rates aggressively to avoid a bubble burst. Tells you what you need to know. Furthermore, no one predicted Congress would pressure GSE's into propping up the mortgage-backed securities market in 2006 and 2007, which ultimately led to a hard landing in 2008.

There are two different kinds of tyranny. Anarchy and authoritarianism. Every reasonable philosophy is trying to have it both ways. Free-market economics merely acknowledges mankind's natural behavior, and attempts to harness the productive attributes for the benefit of our species. The only real argument is about the nature of market-failure, and how to address the failure without triggering bigger problems.

The author is asserting that general theories with limited effectiveness and various caveats are held up by "mainstream" economists as universal economic models. Furthermore, he is intolerant of economic competition and debate between competing theories, which is as pointless as being upset with traders for not agreeing on whether an investment will increase in value or decrease in value.
Logged
Atlas Has Shrugged
ChairmanSanchez
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 38,096
United States


Political Matrix
E: 5.29, S: -5.04


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: October 18, 2014, 11:48:19 AM »

Again, Krugman is the epitome of a "mainstream economist." I don't get why people hang on his word like its gospel.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.024 seconds with 11 queries.