Washington Initiatives 591 and 194 (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 09:36:05 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Individual Politics (Moderator: The Dowager Mod)
  Washington Initiatives 591 and 194 (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: How would you vote on these conflicting initiatives?
#1
Yes/No (D)		  
#2
Yes/No (R)		  
#3
Yes/No (I/O)		  
#4
No/Yes (D)		  
#5
No/Yes (R)		  
#6
No/Yes (I/O)		  
#7
No/No (D)		  
#8
No/No (R)		  
#9
No/No (I/O)		  
#10
Yes/Yes (D)		  
#11
Yes/Yes (R)		  
#12
Yes/Yes (I/O)		  
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results
Total Voters: 49

Author Topic: Washington Initiatives 591 and 194  (Read 779 times)
Lambsbread
20RP12
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 38,365
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.29, S: -7.13
« on: October 22, 2014, 05:34:01 PM »
No/Yes (D) and lol @ the "muh 2nd amendment" wording in the first initiative.
Logged
Lambsbread
20RP12
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 38,365
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.29, S: -7.13
« Reply #1 on: October 22, 2014, 08:30:26 PM »
Quote from: Deus Naturae on October 22, 2014, 05:39:57 PM
Quote from: R2D2 on October 22, 2014, 05:34:01 PM
No/Yes (D) and lol @ the "muh 2nd amendment" wording in the first initiative.

It doesn't even mention the 2nd Amendment.

Did I say it did? No. It sounds like something someone who would say "muh 2nd amendment" would also say.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.027 seconds with 14 queries.